jlam Posted December 27, 2009 Share #1 Posted December 27, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) I'm considering getting a magnifier for my (soon to have) M9. The lenses I'll be using are 18mm, 50 lux, and 90 cron. The magnifier will be primarily for the 50 and 90. Should I get the Leica 1.25x or 1.4x (or an after-market 1.25x or 1.35x)? I've read that with the 1.4x one can't see outside the 50mm frameline but it allows both eyes to be open. Since the total magnification is not exactly 1.0x (but 0.95x), is it really comfortable to have both eyes open? If so what are the advantages? Joseph Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Hi jlam, Take a look here Anyone using VF magnifier on M9?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jaapv Posted December 27, 2009 Share #2 Posted December 27, 2009 It is a personal thing. I find I focus more accurately without a magnifier (but with the appropriate diopter!) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonoslack Posted December 27, 2009 Share #3 Posted December 27, 2009 HI Joseph I'm with Jaap here - I've tried using multipliers, but for me the joy of the M is to have a unified view. I found that I can focus okay with a 90, and really easily with a 50 (and shoot with my eyes open). I actually use contact lenses rather than a dioptre . . . . but maybe you don't have old git vision problems anyway! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gentleman Villain Posted December 27, 2009 Share #4 Posted December 27, 2009 It is a personal thing. I find I focus more accurately without a magnifier (but with the appropriate diopter!) Hi Jaapv, my knowledge of the diopters is a bit fuzzy. What diopters would you recommend in combination with which focal lengths? Thanks I've never quite felt right about the magnifiers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPH1962 Posted December 27, 2009 Share #5 Posted December 27, 2009 Hi there I wear glasses with correction for close and normal view. On the M9 is use occasionally the Leica 1.4x. I appreciate it for the 90 cron and the 135 Elmar. On lenses up to 75 I do not need it. When focussing at close distance I appreciate it on the mentioned longer lenses. JPH Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
haroldp Posted December 27, 2009 Share #6 Posted December 27, 2009 I tried 1.25X ( with 50 cron and 90 elmarit on M8 ) and while it felt good, examination in detail showed that my focus was at least as good or marginally better with just the naked finder. M9 has less magnification so might be different, but I have not yet used anything longer than 50 on my M9. Could just be my eyes ?? Regards .... H Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagsiva Posted December 27, 2009 Share #7 Posted December 27, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) I use the 1.4x with the Nocti 0.95 and Cron 90 F2. Makes focus a lot easier, particularly in low-light when I most use these lenses. I also find that the framelines more suited for these focal lenths. This is even more critical when I want to focus on a particular part of the face etc. sinc the DOF is quite narrow. For simple and light, I ususally go with 35/50 cron and don't really see the need for the mag. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wlaidlaw Posted December 27, 2009 Share #8 Posted December 27, 2009 I am using one of Dirk Rosler's 1.15x ones with variable diopter. It is a bit marginal at 28mm but you can just about manage. It certainly helps at 50mm and above and I like the variable diopter feature. This is not foolproof as the diopter seems to require slightly different adjustments for very close and distant focus distances. I am not sure why this is as the VF should always produce a virtual image at 2 meters but others have found the same thing. Wilson Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Googaliser Posted December 28, 2009 Share #9 Posted December 28, 2009 I use the 1.4x with the Nocti 0.95 and Cron 90 F2. Makes focus a lot easier, particularly in low-light when I most use these lenses. I also find that the framelines more suited for these focal lenths. This is even more critical when I want to focus on a particular part of the face etc. sinc the DOF is quite narrow. For simple and light, I ususally go with 35/50 cron and don't really see the need for the mag. +1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
russell Posted December 30, 2009 Share #10 Posted December 30, 2009 I just bought a 1.4x viewfinder. I started shooting with a M3 so I like the idea of 1:1. This lets me keep both eyes open and not have to squint. This gives a better rapport with your subject as well as extending the "area outside the framelines" as much as possible. Sure for the final touch-focus I squint but only at the last moment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted December 30, 2009 Share #11 Posted December 30, 2009 Hi Jaapv, my knowledge of the diopters is a bit fuzzy. What diopters would you recommend in combination with which focal lengths? Thanks I've never quite felt right about the magnifiers. A diopter is basically your reading glasses strength minus 0.5. However, many users are more comfortable with slightly different strengths, so it is wise to experiment before ordering one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.