gwelland Posted March 27, 2010 Share #161 Posted March 27, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) I'm considering "investing" in this lens too, it's difficult to put down. Brett, couldn't you just pull some strings and get a free extended 'loaner' anyway? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 27, 2010 Posted March 27, 2010 Hi gwelland, Take a look here Justifying the 0.95 Noctilux. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
kidigital Posted March 27, 2010 Share #162 Posted March 27, 2010 I've been shooting with the Noct ASPH for the past month or so. I've literally not taken the lens off of my M9 because I want to get to know the lens as well as possible (and because I haven't wanted to take the lens off of the camera). In daylight, I've been using an ND filter and shooting as close to wide open as possible because it happens to be a look that I enjoy. Sometimes it works better than others, but I'm having a blast experimenting with combination. Here's the link: Leica M9 Noctilux f0.95 - a set on Flickr Kurt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bybrett Posted March 27, 2010 Share #163 Posted March 27, 2010 Brett, couldn't you just pull some strings and get a free extended 'loaner' anyway? Graham, that's the problem... the loaner I got for the LFI feature shoot could result in it being a very costly assignment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwelland Posted March 27, 2010 Share #164 Posted March 27, 2010 Graham, that's the problem... the loaner I got for the LFI feature shoot could result in it being a very costly assignment. Too late to file that Police report about how you were mugged when using the lens and 'lost' it before you could send it back? It certainly looks like you and Kurt also are making some magic with that lens! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bybrett Posted March 27, 2010 Share #165 Posted March 27, 2010 Too late to file that Police report about how you were mugged when using the lens and 'lost' it before you could send it back? It certainly looks like you and Kurt also are making some magic with that lens! Ha! Thanks, as we say I'm filling my boots whilst I can. First time I've had a Noctilux in my hands after 32 years of shooting M. I'm going to try it on M8 next. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shade Posted March 27, 2010 Share #166 Posted March 27, 2010 I think the 0.95 Noct is a very good lens. Based on sample pictures I can say that it's very contrasty, sharp wide open (for its class), and pretty compact (considering). Though the price tag is really out of this world. I settled myself on an old F1 Noct, second generation I believe, with a larger detachable hood. I for one, feel that F1 is shallow enough dof, and 0.05 doesn't make a difference IMHO. ALTHOUGH, the addition contrast and sharpness, is always welcome. But for an extra 4000 USD from an old F1 Noct?? Not for me... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrunck Posted March 27, 2010 Share #167 Posted March 27, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) MAH, In all due respect, only a few of the stated images were taken at f/0/95; the others were stopped down past 1.4 except for one at 1.4. Unless you plan on using the f/0.95 frequently, would not the 50 Summilux serve just as well, at a cheaper price and lighter load to carry? But then everyone seems to agree there is some special about the 50 Noct (besides the price)... Jim http://www.jimtrunck.com Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sm23221 Posted March 27, 2010 Share #168 Posted March 27, 2010 If you don't mind the weight (I got used to it) of the lens, using the Nocti instead of the Lux 1.4 allows you to always have that 0.95 aperture available. At f/4 and above it provides the best image quality I've ever experienced. So this really comes down to a weight and size issue. I prefer to always have that 0.95 aperture available, and I'm glad I have it. I would highly recommend trying one first before purchasing to see if the weight is an issue for you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viv Posted March 27, 2010 Share #169 Posted March 27, 2010 MAH, would not the 50 Summilux serve just as well, at a cheaper price and lighter load to carry? http://www.jimtrunck.com Yes, absolutely, for 99.9% of the population. The 0.95 is too big, too heavy, too specialised, and too expensive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bo_Lorentzen Posted March 27, 2010 Share #170 Posted March 27, 2010 LOL - seems like the time for justification have come and gone.. now is the time for finding the right credit card. >>Graham, that's the problem... the loaner I got for the LFI feature shoot could result in it being a very costly assignment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vlad Posted March 27, 2010 Share #171 Posted March 27, 2010 Hell, we're all going to die at some point in time, so we might as well enjoy it to the fullest. Resistance is futile. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jev Posted March 27, 2010 Share #172 Posted March 27, 2010 It's an amazing lens and in combo with M9 it's stunning There is a little justification if you consider only price, but if you consider the experience and enjoyment, it's just great. here are some more samples @ f0.95 In short, if you can do buy it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bybrett Posted March 27, 2010 Share #173 Posted March 27, 2010 MAH, In all due respect, only a few of the stated images were taken at f/0/95; the others were stopped down past 1.4 except for one at 1.4. Unless you plan on using the f/0.95 frequently, would not the 50 Summilux serve just as well, at a cheaper price and lighter load to carry? But then everyone seems to agree there is some special about the 50 Noct (besides the price)... Jim http://www.jimtrunck.com Can't speak for others, but I've been shooting only at 0.95 for about 3 months now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sm23221 Posted March 27, 2010 Share #174 Posted March 27, 2010 NIce shots. In my experience the 0.95 aperture truly isolates the subject that no other lens can. Brett, it's a terrific lens at f/4 and above too. I admit I'm guilty of shooting mostly at 0.95 - this is something the Lux 1.4 cannot do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidigital Posted March 27, 2010 Share #175 Posted March 27, 2010 I'd have to 100% agree with the idea of shooting with the lens at f0.95. It isolates the subject and has a sharpness that provides a 3D type of look that is very unique ... almost as if you are applying a slight tilt/shift perspective in the shot. As an example, here's a shot at f0.95 of a fellow Leica photographer who shoots with the DMR engaging in a conversation and taking a few shots of one of his subjects. Kurt Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/106204-justifying-the-095-noctilux/?do=findComment&comment=1275152'>More sharing options...
gwelland Posted March 27, 2010 Share #176 Posted March 27, 2010 Anyone out there just shooting with the M9 & 50/0.95 as their total outfit? I could see the temptation to go with such a wonderful minimalist outfit. Dear Leica, how about a 35/0.95? Probably impossible to keep small-ish but we can dream can't we? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audiocide Posted March 28, 2010 Share #177 Posted March 28, 2010 Face to face with the new 0.95, a tough decision had to be made.Justifying the unjustifiable is all part of the fun of buying exotic glass but how on earth can you rationalise the idea of purchasing something as ridiculous as the 0.95 ? I think I’ve tested this almost uniquely male skill to the very limit on this one, but after endless fag-packet calculations and much head scratching, I’ve finally arrived at the point where I’ve convinced myself that buying the Nocti borders on being a good idea. Well, almost. I’ll try to explain… I still run a Nikon D3 system, although it sees less and less use the more comfortable i get with the M9. In fact,the main justification was low-light - but recently - despite the lower noise floor - I actually prefer the way the M9 and Lux's see the world. Plus the D3 ergonomics feel very dated by comparison - which is kind of ironic. So by adding up the amount my D3 system will fetch on good old Ebay - I actually come out at a bigger number than the cost of the Nocti. Lets just gloss over the fact that it is a single lens. So good bye 58 1.2, 28 1.4, 50 1.4G and my trusty D3. Time to give Solm's finest a go and see what it does for the creative juices. It also eliminates the 'which should I bring to the party dilema' So for anyone wondering D3 or M9 ? Here is a formerly very loyal Nikon user voting with his feet. I bought the 35 Summicron over the Summilux because it gets better reviews. Don't know if that's the case with the 50 Noctilux. I'd mainly be trying to justify the performance and the size. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audiocide Posted March 28, 2010 Share #178 Posted March 28, 2010 Hell, we're all going to die at some point in time, so we might as well enjoy it to the fullest. Wow... Enjoying life to me is partying like no tomorrow, or driving a rear wheel drive, big torque car. But if it's a fast lens to someone, I guess I'd tell them to go for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Googaliser Posted March 28, 2010 Author Share #179 Posted March 28, 2010 Can't speak for others, but I've been shooting only at 0.95 for about 3 months now. +1 Its utterly addictive.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sm23221 Posted March 29, 2010 Share #180 Posted March 29, 2010 +2, also an addict. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.