Jump to content

Leica Lens Substitutes?


ezc203

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I understand that using a non-Leica lens seems to be taboo, if not frown upon. And although I am a purist in some senses, the price difference is just too great to ignore. So my question is:

 

What's the best substitute? If you had to buy a lens, not Leica, for your M8 what brand would you go for: Zeiss or Voigtlander?

 

Thanks, any suggestions/comments will be greatly appreciated.

Eddie

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's nothing wrong with third party lenses. They don't draw the same way as Leicas do, but there are some Zeiss and Voigtländers that offer a great value for their modest prices. Keep in mind that with the M8 you use the sweet spot of the lens, which means that performance in the far corners is not as crucial.

 

I don't think that you can make a blanket statement regarding Zeiss vs Voigtländer. It depends on the focal length, your needs for lens speed, and your personal preferences. One website that I can recommend is Sean Reid's site, where he painstakingly compares lenses from Leica, Voigtländer, and Zeiss. You need to pay a subscription fee to access it -- which some people object to -- but I have found it to be more than worth it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh, true. Perhaps I have been a tad rash posting the previous question. At this moment I am looking for a (super) wide angel lens. Something in the range of 15mm to 18mm (maybe 21mm, and that's a HUGE maybe). I've only looked extensively into the Voigtlander 15mm f/4,5; the hands-on experience was satisfactory. However, the Zeiss 15mm f/2,8 has been brought to my attention. However, the Zeiss is $4000 and for that much money I'd prefer a 18mm Super-Elmar (which is about a third cheaper, if i'm not mistaken).

 

I suppose I am a bit indecisive, and I don't know what I want? Very problematic.

 

But thanks for the pointers, and the thought-provoking prompts.

 

Eddie

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that using a non-Leica lens seems to be taboo, if not frown upon. And although I am a purist in some senses, the price difference is just too great to ignore. So my question is:

 

What's the best substitute? If you had to buy a lens, not Leica, for your M8 what brand would you go for: Zeiss or Voigtlander?

 

Thanks, any suggestions/comments will be greatly appreciated.

Eddie

 

Both have great lenses in their lineup.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just my 2c: I'd go with Leica for the focal(s) I'd use most, Voigtlander for what I use less, Zeiss in between.

Just as an indication, check Erwin Puts' reviews. He has in-depth coverage for several Leitz, Zeiss & Voigtlander lenses.

If this can be an indication, I got myself an Elmarit 90/2.8, Voigtlander Skopar 21/4 and Heliar 50/3.5 anniversary. Plus, between an used Summicron 50/2 and a new Planar 50/2 I went for this latter. Barring building quality, performances are tantamount and beyond my own potential, I fear...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

As you post this in the M8 forum - be aware that coding is important, if you photograph in color and you want to use UVIR filters - at least below 40mm focal length.

 

Third party lens aren't coded, so you need to find out, how to code your particular lens. There's lots of information available, but it requires some initiative. A newer Leica lens is trouble free compared to that.

 

Having said that, I'm using a Voigtlander Heliar 15, a Zeiss Biogon 2/35 and a Zeiss Distagon 4/18, all hand coded.

 

Cheers

Ivo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the comments. I ended up getting a used Voigtlander SW-Heliar 15mm f/4,5 ASPH for about $250 (came with a used 15mm viewfinder too), and they were in excellent condition, so no complaints here.

 

Took some photos on the way back. Check them out:

 

L1001852.jpg

 

L1001890.jpg

 

L1001899.jpg

 

Thanks for viewing. I actually really enjoy this lens (so far at least). The distortion on the sides are exaggerated and rather silly (reminds me of a fisheye) but I do like that. Only down side in framing is quite tedious and focus is a lot of guess work (however, the deep levels of focus makes the lens quite forgiving when it comes to precision with focus), but those problems are easily solved once I'm more familiar with the lens. Overall, I like it!

 

Eddie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...