ericperlberg Posted November 1, 2009 Share #21 Posted November 1, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) Wandering around with a camera with no aim in mind is senseless.My advise is to think before you go, about what your are going to do, with what lens or lenses and film, and then take just what is needed and forget about changing lenses.-Dick Hmmm, I always go out and wander with my camera with no aim in mind. One man's ceiling is another's floor... Eric Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 1, 2009 Posted November 1, 2009 Hi ericperlberg, Take a look here How do you wear your street gear?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Guest stnami Posted November 1, 2009 Share #22 Posted November 1, 2009 What d'ya say, Skip....? I said why are you walking around pretending to be my mum........... there is a law against that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill Posted November 1, 2009 Share #23 Posted November 1, 2009 Hmmm, I always go out and wander with my camera with no aim in mind. One man's ceiling is another's floor... Eric Me too. Half the fun of it. I fully agree about planning ahead and previsualising when you have an objective in mind, but that's not always the case. Regards, Bill Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest AgXlove Posted November 2, 2009 Share #24 Posted November 2, 2009 Hi, I was wandering which is the easiest way to carry two (or three) M lenses (say 35 & 50) and a M body while trying to capture these marvellous street scenes... It should let you change them as fast as possible and many times being stand up in the middle of the street without any place to put them down. What do you use? For 2-3 lenses and one body, one of these is hard to beat - Domke | PhoTOGS Vest - Large (Khaki) | 734-003 | B&H Photo Video or one of these - Domke | J-803 Digital Satchel | 701-J83 | B&H Photo Video (get the sand color for hot weather, black for night shooting)... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkCambridgeshire Posted November 2, 2009 Share #25 Posted November 2, 2009 Use a photographer's waistcoat - or a decent quality multi pocket waiscoat as sold in many "outdoor clothing" outlets including market stalls in UK for less than £10. Some of them have decent sized pockets. Cheers dunk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_n Posted November 2, 2009 Share #26 Posted November 2, 2009 Two camera bodies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
martinis Posted November 2, 2009 Share #27 Posted November 2, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) tri elmar on sunny days Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bernd Banken Posted November 2, 2009 Share #28 Posted November 2, 2009 For 2-3 lenses and one body, one of these is hard to beat - Domke | PhoTOGS Vest - Large (Khaki) | 734-003 | B&H Photo Video or one of these - Domke | J-803 Digital Satchel | 701-J83 | B&H Photo Video (get the sand color for hot weather, black for night shooting)... embedded shooter..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lars_bergquist Posted November 3, 2009 Share #29 Posted November 3, 2009 Like Bill I should have remembered that the Benser plate doesn't fit the M4 onward. However if the camera is on a neckstrap and it's not raining, two hands are plenty for changing lenses, e.g. Hold new lens in left hand, remove rear cap and place in pocket or between teeth Remove current lens from body with right hand (right thumb presses lens release) Attach new lens with left hand Transfer old lens to left hand, retrieve and fit rear cap. My problem is that I cannot hold both the baseplate and the rear cap in my mouth at the same time. In he film days, we had to remove the baseplate often to change film. Here in Sweden we learnt to hold the baseplate upside down (hollow down) between our teeth. Else, saliva would collect in the hollow, freeze and make it impossible to replace the plate. The old man from the Age of Glass Plates Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
giordano Posted November 3, 2009 Share #30 Posted November 3, 2009 My problem is that I cannot hold both the baseplate and the rear cap in my mouth at the same time. In he film days, we had to remove the baseplate often to change film. Here in Sweden we learnt to hold the baseplate upside down (hollow down) between our teeth. Else, saliva would collect in the hollow, freeze and make it impossible to replace the plate. The old man from the Age of Glass Plates I agree, it takes more than two hands to change lens and film simultaneously. Rather than using my teeth, I always used to put the baseplate in my pocket when changing film on the move. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
haris Posted November 3, 2009 Share #31 Posted November 3, 2009 Camera bag, pockets, courrier bag, whatever I think will be convinient that day. Latelly I prefer to carry camera in pockets or in bags which doesn't look like camera bags, or in bags in which I can carry other things beside photo equipment. Well, with my SLR and MF I usually use camera bag, with 35mm RF as I said above. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
symmetron Posted November 4, 2009 Share #32 Posted November 4, 2009 First of all, it's incumbent upon Leica photographers to dress well and look the part. You're carrying a Leica. Don't dress like you're the quintessential photographer douche bag with stuff hanging all over you, or worse, like you're part of a SWAT team. I see it all the time. Years ago, I would carry two Leicas around my neck with one camera strap shorter than the other. I was traveling to some petty bad areas and my thinking was that keeping the cameras in front of me was safer. Besides having a sore neck, one time I saw a photo of me dressed like that and I was horrified. I looked ridiculous. That was the end of two cameras around my neck. The key is to look subtle, but be responsive. An acquaintance of mine, who is a very well known professional photographer, always carried either one or two cameras each one hanging from his shoulder with the lens pointed toward his body and the camera dangling behind his arm. Kind of tucked in such that the lens and camera were close to the body. That seems to work well. If you're using an M camera, two bodies is probably the way to go as changing lenses is a drag. With a SLR/DLSR and a zoom, you can get away with one body usually. I still like to wear one camera around my neck when I'm carrying a single body/lens. It's hands free. Two lenses/two bodies, then the should carry works in my opinion. Just remember to look the part; you're carrying a Leica. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thompsonkirk Posted November 4, 2009 Share #33 Posted November 4, 2009 I was reading the thread just for fun, but when I came to the Dress Code above, I decided I should ssay something. I make a point of dressing like a slightly goofy tourist. Partly this comes naturally; partly from wearing baggy cargo pants & an old cloth hat. If anyone objects to having their picture taken, I just say 'Oh, I'm sorry - I'm a tourist, & we take pictures of everything.' My cameras don't seem embarrassed by my appearance. I doubt they even notice. As to wearing cameras: I always wear an M8u with a compact lens in a tummy pouch. It's on a wrist strap. If I'm out explicitly for shooting/capturing, I carry another one with 21 lens & external finder on a shoulder strap. This way if the scene becomes interesting, you can literally drop one camera & raise the other in a couple of seconds. Recently I sold a pristine M8u, hoping to beat a price drop & get by with 1 body while waiting for M9. While I generally enjoy working with one lens, I find that changing lenses is a pain in the butt during serious shooting. Kirk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
farnz Posted November 4, 2009 Share #34 Posted November 4, 2009 First of all, it's incumbent upon Leica photographers to dress well and look the part. ... What 'part' would that be? It sounds dangerously like you're suggesting that you are your camera's fashion accessory but of course you wouldn't be suggesting that and I must be mistaken. Pete. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsrockit Posted November 4, 2009 Share #35 Posted November 4, 2009 One camera, one lens. If you must use two lenses, use two cameras. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
symmetron Posted November 4, 2009 Share #36 Posted November 4, 2009 Farnz of course you're mistaken. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xjr Posted November 4, 2009 Share #37 Posted November 4, 2009 "one lens" second that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.