Jump to content

hands-on mini-review with full-sized images


smoody

Recommended Posts

Cool.

 

Incidentally, for those that want to pixel-peep to any extent, you pretty much have to be using Lightroom (or ACR) to get reasonable results. Both Aperture and C1 generate nasty maze patterns, and occasional "purple pixels". That will probably be dealt with the future releases (the S2 appears to have a higher than usual green channel mismatch, which Aperture and C1 can tune out), but for the moment, the Adobe products are only game in town.

 

Sandy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool.

 

Incidentally, for those that want to pixel-peep to any extent, you pretty much have to be using Lightroom (or ACR) to get reasonable results. Both Aperture and C1 generate nasty maze patterns, and occasional "purple pixels". That will probably be dealt with the future releases (the S2 appears to have a higher than usual green channel mismatch, which Aperture and C1 can tune out), but for the moment, the Adobe products are only game in town.

 

Sandy

 

Tried in C1 and everything is more that fine. Are you on Snow Leopard like me? Maybe this makes the difference?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I'm on Snow. Maybe I just spend too much time pixel peeping. :D

 

Regards,

 

Sandy

 

No,

 

seems to be my fault, if you really get above 400% then one can see artifacts, which should not be there. But this is the RAW processor I assume.

 

Other than that the images look great already.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But this is the RAW processor I assume.

 

Yes, it is. C1 was the first raw processor I used to look at the files, and I though the images were just horrible actually; lots of patterns in the model's skin, etc. Even unzoomed it made the skin look a bit rough. Made me wonder what on earth Leica were doing. But with LR the patterns clean up completely, and you get far better skin rendition. There still seems to be some odd looking noise here and there, especially in the lighter areas of the image, however.

 

But that lens is really, really good!

 

Sandy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am glad some folks got to download the S2 files I posted on YouSendIt. I got an email from YouSendIt saying my bandwidth has been exceeded. So thats probably all I can help since I don't plan to upgrade the YouSendIt service. I hope to get time to look at the files more closely this evening.

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am glad some folks got to download the S2 files I posted on YouSendIt. I got an email from YouSendIt saying my bandwidth has been exceeded. So thats probably all I can help since I don't plan to upgrade the YouSendIt service. I hope to get time to look at the files more closely this evening.

 

Mark

 

Thanks for sharing. The dng was totally different from a similar processed jpg from another site. The 100% view in photoshop CS4 default settings is good enough for iridology and dermatology. Noise reduction and sharpening to personal preferences will generate a lot of heated debate but the photographer will not be practically limited by the resolution available from the lenses as is the case for Nikon and Canon. If you go handheld, ditch the coffee and get those Zen meditation skills honed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...