Jump to content

6 bit code for Apo-Telyt 135


chris_tribble

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Does anyone know the correct code for the Apo-Telyt 135. As I'm only going to be using M9 (planning to get the second body soon) I no longer need to use my adapted 135 coded mount (Malcolm Taylor's sorting me out on this...) However, I do need the correct 6 bit code for the Apo-Telyt and this hasn't been added to the excellent Leica Code's page (Leica M8 Lens Codes).

 

REALLY grateful if someone can post an image of the coded 135 A-T base or give the code (reading clockwise as you look at the back of the lens - the coding for the 135 Elmarit reads 001001 where zero = white)

 

Thanks for any help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Chis:

 

All of my lenses are coded with the exception of the 135 and that is because coding was unavailable for the M8. Most likely, I will not code it when I am able to purchase the M9 as the focal length is so long for the M.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no coding pattern for any 135 except the f/2.8 with goggles. The 135 f/3.4 can be manually selected in the M9 menu of lenses, if one wants the focal length to show up in EXIF and whatever microscopic corrections are needed (if any).

 

Important point: Leica has added several lenses to the menu - but that does not mean they have also assigned a 6-bit number for those same lenses or will provide coded mounts for those lenses.

 

Coding - and the menu - are two separate and distinct pathways to identifying the lens in use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to all for replies. I'd also noted that the Apo Telyt 135 is listed on the M9 menu - hence the question - up until now I'd used the Elmarit codes... Do we really think that there's no 6 bit code for a lens that can be manually selected... Odd?

 

I'll email Leica and see if I can get any advice...

 

Best

 

C:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked a similar questions about the 35mm pre-asph Summilux. It's on the manual menu but no 6-bit. I'm still holding out hope for a mystery missing 6-bit for these guys.

 

I think I am right in saying that 6 bits only allows for 62 lenses (ignoring 00 00 00 and 11 11 11). Maybe they are running out of codes.

 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris,

 

If you can shoot a DNG with the code set to Apo Telyt 135 and post it somewhere it should be possible to pull the code from the MakerNotes; I think we understand them well enough to get that much out.

 

Sandy

 

Perhaps... My bet is that the embedded manual list is outside of the 6-bit encoding range (older 6-bit excepted), thus will not provide a usable code.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I am right in saying that 6 bits only allows for 62 lenses (ignoring 00 00 00 and 11 11 11). Maybe they are running out of codes.

 

Why ignore them?

 

Anyway since the firmware uses the frame selector - if you have the correct code with the wrong framelines the lens isn't recognised - it's actually 3 x 64 permutations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why ignore them?

 

Anyway since the firmware uses the frame selector - if you have the correct code with the wrong framelines the lens isn't recognised - it's actually 3 x 64 permutations.

 

 

I am not sure about that. I tried to mark a 6-bit code onto a lux 35 pre-asph, and kept on getting it wrong. It was however recognized by the camera as a 75 cron or some other lens... depending on my marking.... It did not seem to matter what the frame selector was set to... as they say your milage may vary...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would surmise 62 x 3 = 186 lenses?? At least as far as I know the 6 bit code only works if the frameline cam is at the right position. This would mean that the tables are both 6 bit and frame dependent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would surmise 62 x 3 = 186 lenses?? At least as far as I know the 6 bit code only works if the frameline cam is at the right position. This would mean that the tables are both 6 bit and frame dependent.

 

Thats what the math would suggest... but I note in the Leica M8 Lens Codes... Leica M8 Lens Codes There are no duplicates, and if I recall correctly I don't remember a electronic connection between the cam, and the computer (when the m8 was taken apart). If the M9 is different... then that opens a big kettle of fish...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what the math would suggest... but I note in the Leica M8 Lens Codes... Leica M8 Lens Codes There are no duplicates, and if I recall correctly I don't remember a electronic connection between the cam, and the computer (when the m8 was taken apart). If the M9 is different... then that opens a big kettle of fish...

 

With a coded Tri-Elmar 28/35//50, the M8 and M9 are using the cam to now which focal lens is in use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With a coded Tri-Elmar 28/35//50, the M8 and M9 are using the cam to now which focal lens is in use.

 

Good point... I just picked up one.... I will have to test... but the MATE has only one 6-bit code (101010 (42)) not three, then how would that work?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good point... I just picked up one.... I will have to test... but the MATE has only one 6-bit code (101010 (42)) not three, then how would that work?

 

The 28-35-50 Tri-Elmar also only has one 6 bit code, the camera knows which focal length has been selected because of the frame line selector.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 28-35-50 Tri-Elmar also only has one 6 bit code, the camera knows which focal length has been selected because of the frame line selector.

 

That would imply that the 6 bit code is incorrect. It is actually a 8-bit code, generated by two distinct mechanisms. If one were to analyze the Leica M8 Lens Codes in relation to embedded codes in firmware I wonder what codes would be the relationship, if any.

 

However, if one would wish to 6-bit a lens that is only in the manual list, I wonder if there is any relationship to the bar code at all. In manual mode the bar code/frame line selector are ignored in terms firmware, and the manual list does not have to conform to the 6-bit lens list. There are just a few that overlap... and as I remember, if you are in manual mode, and put a 6-bit lens on, it does not switch back to auto....

 

Just a thought...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...