Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'exif'.
Found 4 results
-
Moin! Bei den meisten Bildern sieht man's natürlich, dennoch die Frage ob die Aktivierung/Nutzung der Makrofunktion der Q2 irgendwo in den EXIF Daten ausgewiesen wird. Wäre z.B. nützlich bei der Durchsuchung grösserer Bildbestände per Software nach derartigen Fotos. Danke, schönes WE und cheers, thomas
-
I have been poking around a lot in the jpegs the M10 produces using Exiftool. I'm working on a project where I'm trying to get preview data out of the files as quickly as possible. Thus far I'm not impressed or at least confused by the data in the files. Just about any operation throws out an ICC profile length warning, apparently when the declared profile length doesn't match the actual length of the profile: Warning: Bad length ICC_Profile (length 3144) Also try extracting the preview images and thumbnail images: exiftool -a -b -W %d%f_%t%-c.%s -preview:all *.JPG Extracted preview images are unreadable by chrome, safari, and preview.app, but oddly Firefox reads and displays and image. These are a nice size at 1440x940 and 133kb, and it'd be great to use them since the Maestro processor has already done the work to resize them. The thumbnails are 160px wide and base64-encoded. They seem have black bars at the top and bottom. You can see them as iPhone iOS reads an SD card and otherwise on macOS. Extracting these works, but they have black bars along the top and bottom. Since I'm seeing this on the apple platforms and with ExifTool I think those bars may be part of the data. The DNG is another story. It appears to be healthier. From the DNG, a similar thumbnail image is present with the black bars. There are two preview images embedded in the DNG file. First is a ~1.6MB jpeg at 100/24MP size. Presumably this is the chimping image we actually see when we zoom in while using the back of the camera. The second is the 1440x940 small preview image from the jpeg, but this time it's intact and readable by usual programs. It seems like something is wrong with the JPG files the camera creates, like the EXIF data is improperly copied or something. This is frustrating, for $7000 this should be correct.
-
Hello, There are many, many programs which can read the Exif data of a picture, but usually none of them is able to show all the customer specific fields. The question is: what is, in your opinion, the best currently available Exif metadata reader? It should be able to get info like the Leica Look "emulation" just introduced (just to give an example). Hoping that it does exists... Den
-
I have recently purchased a C-Lux which was released in June 2018. Being new, I cannot find a dedicated forum for this camera. When I take a number of photos using different settings such as A, A+, P, Scenes etc, the exact method of taking the photo is displayed on the photo when I look at it in the camera but when I transfer it to my PC, the exif information on the actual program settings used to take the photo is missing. It would be quite helpful to have this info in the exif data so that I can see the difference between taking photos (particularly of the same scene) and comparing the results. Is this something that Leica would add in the future or is there some way to have this info included in the exif data.?
