Jump to content

Evening Grosbeak, M9, Viso III, Telyt 400/5.6


k-hawinkler

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

My Visoflex III just came back from a clean and adjust by John Van Stelten of Focal Point, INC.

WOW! What a super job he did at a very reasonable cost. Many many thanks to John Van Stelten!

 

Best, K-H.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Karl-Albert, Stuart, Tri, Alexander, Thank you.

 

Alexander,

 

With regards to your question, I have been buying these items from ebay.com, keh.com in Atlanta, and other US and European online sites in England, Holland, Germany, and Austria.

 

I typically search for Visoflex or Telyt and then look only for Visoflex III as I have an M9. The prices have gone up lately quite a bit for the Visoflexes though and vary wildly.

 

If you want to use a Telyt via Visoflex III on an M8 or M9 make sure that you don't buy a Telyt-R version. It's too long and can't focus to infinity. Please, see here:

 

http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/1265398-post37.html

http://www.farines-photo.com/images_assets/P1000114b.jpg

 

There are 200, 280, 400, and 560 mm Telyts, that I am familiar with, and some others.

 

For the 280/4.8 Telyt, version III is best. If you are lucky enough to find the Televit adapter 14138 http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/1601604-post109.html you can even mount the lens head on the Televit. That looks like the second image in http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/1533078-post63.html.

 

For the 400 and 560 mm Telyts there are f/5.6 and f/6.8 versions.

 

I prefer the f/5.6 versions for birds etc. as they mount via a Televit and focus can be adjusted by turning a little know. If the Visoflex one uses is properly adjusted, one can get amazing focusing precision IMHO. The f/5.6 distortions near the image boundaries don't matter for these uses.

 

If one wants to use the entire image, as in a landscape shot, then I prefer the f/6.8 version as it has less distortion.

 

Best, K-H.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You did it again!

Seems a bit over-PP-ed?

 

Otto,

 

Many thanks for your feedback. Could be, I am still learning Photoshop, have a long way to go. Here is another attempt.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

What do you think of this version? It seems hard to find just the perfect fit - where the image still looks natural but is as sharp as naturally looking permits.

 

Best, K-H.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I like this better in the PP sense, it is more natural, and there is also more depth because it's not oversharpened. Can hardly believe this is the same shot btw, at first glance. The first one is more Canon-type, the second is how it should be ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Otto,

 

Thanks again. Both my wife and I independently have come to the same conclusion that this last version is more naturally looking and therefore better processed. When I did the first version I saw what the sharpening did, but didn't have the presence of mind to dial back.

 

I have also noticed that I have become much more critical in judging my own post-processing, not only for sharpening, but for color fidelity and dark and light areas as well. Sometimes, I even go back and redo images I did some time ago. Too bad I didn't shoot RAW all the way back to 2007 when I got my first DSLR, a D40.

 

I never had a Canon DSLR, but I have Nikons DSLRs, including a D3. I must say, the M9 images, when done right, clearly stand out.

 

Again, thank you so much for your very constructive feedback.

That helps me a lot in dealing with these subtleties.

 

Best, K-H.

Link to post
Share on other sites

K-H,

 

I think it's about time we give the Grosbeak a compliment for being so well groomed and handsome.

Extraordinarily gorgeous and a type of photography that I know nothing about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting those beautiful images. I am lucky to have some long Visio lenses. You say that your VisioIII was adjusted. What needs to be done? because I would ask someone to work on it too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Well, I don't work on it myself, but here is my experience.

First, the Visoflex needs to be examined for damage.

I lost one viewfinder because the prism had water damage that I didn't spot.

Second, cleaning gives a brighter image for focusing.

And finally, third, the adjustments themselves.

The mirror needs to be angled and placed correctly.

The matte glass screen through shims needs to be exactly at the same distance

from the lens as the sensor inside the attached camera.

Otherwise focusing becomes a guessing game.

 

I also noticed that the actual image on the sensor is just a tiny bit wider

than what I see through the viewfinder.

 

If I lived in Europe I would send my gear to Will Van Manen for service.

 

Best, K-H.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Not really. Will Van Manen would want the VISO and the lens.

Not to pair them. But to fine tune the lens as well so that it is up to the

increased accuracy requirements for digital cameras.

 

K-H,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...