Jump to content

Hektor 4.5/135


ryee3

Recommended Posts

Please comment on this lens for its value to use as a everyday telephoto lens or is it better as a nice paper weight and conversational piece. The serial number is 171xxxx. Thanks!:)

 

 

...hey, ryee3, I recommend using the search facility in your quest. My initial trawl reveals that it is a more than competent lens - read on:

 

http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-m8-forum/76629-m8-hektor-135-mm-f-4-a.html

 

http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-collectors-historica/93415-whats-consensus-lens.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have actually used this Hektor to good effect on a Leica CL (surprising myself). It's an excellent bargain: very good Leica quality for the money. It's not Leica's best today or a lens I would use every day, &c, but if yours is in good shape you'll get a lot of keepers out of it. At the prices they're going for now, there's no reason not to get one, esp if you need something between a 90/100 and a 180, though you prolly wouldn't use those on an M, anyway. Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please comment on this lens for its value to use as a everyday telephoto lens or is it better as a nice paper weight and conversational piece. The serial number is 171xxxx. Thanks!:)

 

If you have already it you can judge by yourself about its quality, now, if you can afford, you can find better leitz/leica lens in this focal lenght.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A fine lens, I use it a lot. I think it is better at f 5.6. The image is not so good when stopped down to f 16 to 32. My piece was made in 1952.

 

There are just two problems with Hektor: 1) at least here in Brazil, it is difficult to find an Hektor (specially in screwmount) with the glass perfect. The usual shape would be a "more ou less aceptable". Never saw, in person, a perfect Hektor. 2) it is a little big. In fact, maybe too big for the small Barnack Leica, if you want to walk in the street with it.

 

Regards

 

Martin

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
A fine lens, I use it a lot. I think it is better at f 5.6. The image is not so good when stopped down to f 16 to 32. My piece was made in 1952.

 

There are just two problems with Hektor: 1) at least here in Brazil, it is difficult to find an Hektor (specially in screwmount) with the glass perfect. The usual shape would be a "more ou less aceptable". Never saw, in person, a perfect Hektor. 2) it is a little big. In fact, maybe too big for the small Barnack Leica, if you want to walk in the street with it.

 

Regards

 

Martin

I agree, Martin. My wife and I signed up for an adult "zoo" class which meets weekly and we walk around the various "zoo environments" and learn all about each animal from volunteers there. It is a great photo session and I love taking my Leica outfit. Here is a colorful shot of a monkey (endangered species from Brazil) with my IIIf and Hektor 135mm. I think it looks like a portrait and I just love the "painterly" bokah!

 

http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/nature-wildlife/102665-golden-lion-tamarin.html#post1082289

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...