edlbell Posted November 20, 2006 Share #1 Posted November 20, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) I posted this jpeg image in another thread and someone else stated that they too had a file like this. Has anyone else had files like this? Ed Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/9718-negative-images-m8/?do=findComment&comment=99448'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 20, 2006 Posted November 20, 2006 Hi edlbell, Take a look here Negative images - M8. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
marknorton Posted November 20, 2006 Share #2 Posted November 20, 2006 I don't think he's green with envy about your new camera... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick_dykstra Posted November 20, 2006 Share #3 Posted November 20, 2006 At least he's not magenta! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbretteville Posted November 20, 2006 Share #4 Posted November 20, 2006 Inverted = Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Not exactly a "performance proof". Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Not exactly a "performance proof". ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/9718-negative-images-m8/?do=findComment&comment=99474'>More sharing options...
carstenw Posted November 20, 2006 Share #5 Posted November 20, 2006 Hey, I am "someone else". Whaddayaknow, I didn't delete mine after all: Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/9718-negative-images-m8/?do=findComment&comment=99484'>More sharing options...
mike prevette Posted November 20, 2006 Share #6 Posted November 20, 2006 WTF! Please explain the circumstances under which these showed up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
carstenw Posted November 20, 2006 Share #7 Posted November 20, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) WTF! Please explain the circumstances under which these showed up. With mine, to provoke this, I... pushed the button. I was taking several similar ones, trying to provoke the magenta cast issue, and this happened. Just once in all my pictures. Here is the negative version of this negative version, showing that I was successful in provoking the magenta cast. The sweater is pitch-black... Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/9718-negative-images-m8/?do=findComment&comment=99492'>More sharing options...
mike prevette Posted November 20, 2006 Share #8 Posted November 20, 2006 wow scary, you two should compare serial numbers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickR Posted November 20, 2006 Share #9 Posted November 20, 2006 You must have hit the Lomography setting by mistake. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob_x2004 Posted November 20, 2006 Share #10 Posted November 20, 2006 Is this a serious post or a wind up? If it is fairdinkum, hasn't the image got a second frame exposed over the first? The arm and sleeve, jeans and belt buckle is pretty obvious on right, and it carries clear across the frame. If it is a joke I reckon some of you blokes ought to get married. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/9718-negative-images-m8/?do=findComment&comment=99519'>More sharing options...
baloo Posted November 21, 2006 Share #11 Posted November 21, 2006 Hi! Append to me twice and I think it as some thing to do with overexposure 8 or 10 stop over and flash at least that was I was doing when it append. Steve, don’t have those shot sorry deleted them sorry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
deecy Posted November 21, 2006 Share #12 Posted November 21, 2006 Great abstractions! T// Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
digi_guru Posted November 21, 2006 Share #13 Posted November 21, 2006 Yes, I had this once on my M8 too, in a DNG file. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
frc Posted November 21, 2006 Share #14 Posted November 21, 2006 In Solms the heart attack rate must have dramaticaly risen lately. C'm on this can't be real. I'm working on a documentary covering the Dutch elections at the moment, using my MP and a Nikon DSLR, the Leica beats the Nikon on every aspect exept the postprocessing. So much I hoped to have the solution in my hands with the M8, and now I feel so disappointed seeing these images. Purchase doesn't seems to be an option. Sometimes I wonder whether it's not all just a bad dream. Waking up one morning and finding out it all wasn't true will most probably not happen. Oh dear, what misery Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddawn Posted November 21, 2006 Share #15 Posted November 21, 2006 Great abstractions! T// Yes! This is actually a feature of the M8! It's designed for those of us who miss our negs. Though you can't file this one away, at least it's already pre-scanned in digital form ready for color correction U know, like how the IR sensitive CCD of the M8 has actually become a pre-designed feature, and the mandatory use of IR blocking filters, or the very idea of it, has somehow been assimilated, accepted and even recommended by everyone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
erl Posted November 21, 2006 Share #16 Posted November 21, 2006 David, I think it's called 'pragmatism'. Working pro's are mostly used to 'P' and working despite the difficulties. It's called, " if I don't get a (some) result, depite the problems, I won't get paid. Of course, there are limits, which each defines for ones self. Cheers, Erl Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
carstenw Posted November 21, 2006 Share #17 Posted November 21, 2006 Mine is no joke. I don't even own a flash, so it must be something else. Now that I look at the EXIF, it is probably badly underexposed. I have another similar shot which is fine at 1/60s, but this one was shot at 1/750s. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
egibaud Posted November 21, 2006 Share #18 Posted November 21, 2006 definetely the best camera ever. for the price of one camera you get a digital camera + an IR camera + an artistic random neg feature for century 22st exhib in NYC. Who can complain about this?. (sorry for my sense of humour) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbretteville Posted November 21, 2006 Share #19 Posted November 21, 2006 Didn't someone mention that Leica were working on five issues? Magenta, banding, green blob and awb leaves room for one more at least. - C Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Branch Posted November 21, 2006 Share #20 Posted November 21, 2006 Read the manual about long exposures and pictures in low light. Camera re-reads the "Dark " sensor. If you arn't careful you can indeed double expose etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.