sundance Posted August 14, 2009 Share #1 Posted August 14, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) i want a really good monitor with credible color reproduction. i am between 3 monitors. 1.EIZO ColorEdge CE240W i think it's very credible but i don't know if newer models are much better (i think this model is since 2005?) 2.EIZO FlexScan SX2761W i think it's also credible with 12-Bit Gamma, 16-Bit Internal Processing,large panel which fits me cause i work lots of cad,photoshop,3ds max (i am an architect). i don't know if it's that good for color reprodustion cause it's not in the list of thegraphic monitors. 3.PRAD | Review NEC LCD2690WUXi great panel but the noise that it makes intimidates me a lot. any help would be highly appreciated! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted August 14, 2009 Posted August 14, 2009 Hi sundance, Take a look here eizo-which one?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
ceflynn Posted August 14, 2009 Share #2 Posted August 14, 2009 You might find this helpful: Luminous landscape Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie Roberts Posted August 14, 2009 Share #3 Posted August 14, 2009 Short answer? Any of the EIZO CGs are the right ones for photography--they're the best you can get IMO. The high end NECs are excellent as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfarkas Posted August 15, 2009 Share #4 Posted August 15, 2009 The most popular Eizo display for photo applications is, by far, the CG241W. Eizo ColorEdge CG241W 24" LCD Monitor - Black The CE240W is not not bad by any means. But, as Jamie pointed out, the CG series is tops for serious photographic color applications. Harware calibrated, 12-bit LUT, 16-bit precision, 5-year warranty, automatic uniformity correction, ability to store multiple profiles, 90 degree rotation for portraits, etc. Just a great monitor. David Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaraldL Posted August 15, 2009 Share #5 Posted August 15, 2009 Try and have a look at Quato. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sundance Posted August 15, 2009 Author Share #6 Posted August 15, 2009 please try to choose one of the ones that i propodes in the first post. which is the most suitable? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted August 15, 2009 Share #7 Posted August 15, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) I have the 24" version of the NEC you cite, with Multisync built in. I'm very happy with it, and don't know what you mean by excessive noise. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_j Posted August 16, 2009 Share #8 Posted August 16, 2009 Hello- I have had a 2690 for almost 2 years and have been happy with it. You do need to buy the NEC software to calibrate it. Their puck isn't necessary my Eye I version 2 works fine. I have read about noise on earlier models but it is not a problem on the one I have. I am considering a second monitor another 2690 is in the mix. Best, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sundance Posted August 16, 2009 Author Share #9 Posted August 16, 2009 I have read about noise on earlier models but it is not a problem on the one I have. as newer models,do you mean the 2690WUXi² NEC Display Solutions - MultiSync<sup>®</sup> LCD2690WUXi² is this screen better than the 2690WUXi? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_j Posted August 17, 2009 Share #10 Posted August 17, 2009 Sundance- The monitor you mentioned (2 at the end of the model number) is the latest version of the 2690. I believe it came out perhaps a year ago(?). It has a wider color area than the 2690 I have. I have seen some chatter on the internet that the panel in a different type but I cannot comment on that. Mine is the original but from a later production run. I remember reading that some of first releases had a problem with a whining noise. Best, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.