Jump to content

Mike Johnston's praise of Leica


rosuna

Recommended Posts

Two beautiful articles by Mike Johnston about Leicas as teaching tools...

 

1.

The Online Photographer: The Leica as Teacher

 

2.

The Online Photographer: Why It Has To Be a Leica

 

Enjoy.

 

Hi Ruben,

 

I'm surprised there isn't more discussion on this thread. Those two posts were very interesting.

 

Cheers,

 

Sean

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm surprised there isn't more discussion on this thread. Those two posts were very interesting.

 

Judging from the third article there was a lively discussion at the Online Photographer. After reading the first piece, I thought to myself "yes, but why does it have to be a Leica". After reading the second article I still felt that the exercise would be just as effective with quite a few other cameras. To name but three:

  • Rollei or similar TLR: looking down at the reversed image makes you think about what you're doing - or you can use the sports finder for a direct view.
  • Rollei 35: excellent bright-line finder, full manual control, and every photographer should be able to estimate distances.
  • Classic Minox: Good finder, scale focusing, and the added challenge of making impactful pictures within the constraints of an 8x11 negative.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Judging from the third article there was a lively discussion at the Online Photographer. After reading the first piece, I thought to myself "yes, but why does it have to be a Leica". After reading the second article I still felt that the exercise would be just as effective with quite a few other cameras. To name but three:

  • Rollei or similar TLR: looking down at the reversed image makes you think about what you're doing - or you can use the sports finder for a direct view.
  • Rollei 35: excellent bright-line finder, full manual control, and every photographer should be able to estimate distances.
  • Classic Minox: Good finder, scale focusing, and the added challenge of making impactful pictures within the constraints of an 8x11 negative.

 

You might want to read his third installment...see my link above.

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might want to read his third installment...see my link above.

Jeff

 

I read it before posting, but it quite failed to persuade me that it has to be a Leica - and that's after using Leicas with pleasure for most of 40 years.

 

The strongest argument in the second installment is that a Leica will not embarrass you in high society. That's true - provided you haven't customised it with a pink kid covering and tattoos - but it's equally true of the other three cameras I mentioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read it before posting, but it quite failed to persuade me that it has to be a Leica - and that's after using Leicas with pleasure for most of 40 years.

 

.

 

 

The third article (not the second) says it doesn't have to be a Leica.

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...