stewardrobbins Posted October 21, 2006 Share #1 Posted October 21, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) I think the M8 would be perfect for 98% of my photography. However, I occasionally do product shots – not true macro - that need to be a bit closer than .7 meters. I don’t do enough of this work to justify investing in a macro Elmar. Is there an inexpensive solution to my problem (close-up lenses, extension tubes, etc.) or should I just keep my Canon DSLR for this kind of photography? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 21, 2006 Posted October 21, 2006 Hi stewardrobbins, Take a look here Occasional close-ups with M8?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
marknorton Posted October 21, 2006 Share #2 Posted October 21, 2006 Your problems are framing and focussing. FOlowing advice here, I bought Macro Elmar, Macro Adapter and Angle Finder which provides a good solution, even if it doesn't allow to get bigger that 3:1. Since you don't want to go down that road, I think you should stick with your DSLR. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnastovall Posted October 21, 2006 Share #3 Posted October 21, 2006 I would keep the dSLR. That's what I'm doing different tools for different jobs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas_schertel Posted October 21, 2006 Share #4 Posted October 21, 2006 You also can use the visoflex I or III-System. It ist, compared with the M8 body, not really expensive. Another solution would be the old double range Summicron. yours sicerely Thomas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wparsonsgisnet Posted October 21, 2006 Share #5 Posted October 21, 2006 I second Thomas' recommendation of the 50mm f2.0 DR. This lens keeps appearing on eBay in the few hundred dollars range. Besides the fact that it is an absolutely superb lens, it goes almost to 1:1. It comes with (or needs) goggles. On the M8, the stop will need to be removed for the goggles to function correctly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
waterlenz Posted October 22, 2006 Share #6 Posted October 22, 2006 I second Thomas' recommendation of the 50mm f2.0 DR. This lens keeps appearing on eBay in the few hundred dollars range. Besides the fact that it is an absolutely superb lens, it goes almost to 1:1. It comes with (or needs) goggles. On the M8, the stop will need to be removed for the goggles to function correctly. Leica needs to clarify the nature of the incompatibility of the dual-range Summicron (a.k.a. NF Summicron) with the M8. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blakley Posted October 22, 2006 Share #7 Posted October 22, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) The DR Summicron doesn't come close to 1:1 reproduction. It's more like 1:5. Still, it's a good lens for closeups, though not as good as the Macro-Elmar 90/4 with Macro-Adapter M, which is compatible with the M8 according to Leica's information - and which gets to about a 1:3 reproduction ratio. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marknorton Posted October 22, 2006 Share #8 Posted October 22, 2006 Thanks Bob, I said 3:1 and should of course have written 1:3. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fredbonhomme Posted October 22, 2006 Share #9 Posted October 22, 2006 And what about the 90/4 macro ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted October 22, 2006 Share #10 Posted October 22, 2006 Thanks Bob, I said 3:1 and should of course have written 1:3. Isn't the ratio 1 : 2.25 on the M8 (or something like that)? With the ability to check focus and composition on the LCD, the M8 makes the Macro Elmar a much more useful proposition (for macro photography) than it ever was with the film M bodies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stnami Posted October 22, 2006 Share #11 Posted October 22, 2006 Dear Mr Grasshopper I own a M8( well sorta, well not really yet... but I know everything about it but I have not seen one) and I want to photograph you. Please help signed Mr Occasion Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marknorton Posted October 22, 2006 Share #12 Posted October 22, 2006 Ian, the reproduction ratio refers to the size of the image projected on the sensor, compared to the size of the original. Therefore, when Imants gets to photograph his grasshopper, the size of the image on the sensor will be 1/3 the size of our crop-eating friend and that reproduction ratio is independent of sensor size. The angle of view of the lens will restrict the actual size of the object which can be reproduced. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stnami Posted October 22, 2006 Share #13 Posted October 22, 2006 I shall keep my D2 and elpro for shots of Jiminy Cricket and friends and use a M8 to take shots of the locust swarms on the moon, when Virgin Airways begins its flights . Sounds practical considering the shrinking grasshoppers I am sure there will be better uses for the 8 than closeup stuff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marknorton Posted October 22, 2006 Share #14 Posted October 22, 2006 Yes, I agree, it's pushing the M8 where it doesn't really belong. But you have to admire their ingenuity in getting the macro stuff together. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blakley Posted October 22, 2006 Share #15 Posted October 22, 2006 With the M8's crop factor, you'll get "sort of" the equivalent of 1.3 : 3 = 1 : 2.3 with the 90/4 Macro-Elmar plus Macro Adapter M. I say "sort of" because you get 1 : 3 magnification and then a 1.3X crop - so it's like taking a slide shot at 1 : 3 mangnification, cropping off the outer edges, and then "stretching" the slide to fit the original mount. Effectively it'll seem to be magnifying the subject more. With the 50/2 DR summicron, you'll get 1.3 : 5 = 1 : 3.8 on the M8. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.