rob_x2004 Posted October 20, 2006 Share #1 Â Posted October 20, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) Was scabbing up empty film cans from the local today, and took what they had. Decided to sort out the 400 ISO cans from everything else for my "roll your owns" rather than have to texta 100 or 400 on the loaded cans. Â Surprised me, 1033grams of 400 ISO compared to 476g of 100, 200, 800 and even something else. There were another ten or so cans discarded and all but one was 400ISO. Â Nothing scientific, just surprising or not so surprising insight into consumer point and shoot preference. Â ......[ATTACH]12246[/ATTACH] Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 20, 2006 Posted October 20, 2006 Hi rob_x2004, Take a look here 476 v 1033, a comparison.. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
christer Posted October 20, 2006 Share #2 Â Posted October 20, 2006 Of course, we high volume, low iso speed film users always do our own developing at home. My dustbin will show almost all 100, some 25 and the odd 400/3200 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stnami Posted October 20, 2006 Share #3  Posted October 20, 2006 With this volume it is hard to fathom why they closed all the Argentinian smelters down in Newcastle surely along with the demand for Knights armour it was a bad move     images http://www.etrouko.com.au Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stnami Posted October 20, 2006 Share #4  Posted October 20, 2006 400 it is probably because you hedge your bets like most on the day abd anticipate atleast a few low light or contrast ridden shots     Images………………………………etrouko Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
franklinh Posted November 7, 2006 Share #5 Â Posted November 7, 2006 Makes intuitive sense to me. 400 is a favorite sweet spot for film users. Â Franklin Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.