Jump to content

476 v 1033, a comparison.


rob_x2004

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Was scabbing up empty film cans from the local today, and took what they had. Decided to sort out the 400 ISO cans from everything else for my "roll your owns" rather than have to texta 100 or 400 on the loaded cans.

 

Surprised me, 1033grams of 400 ISO compared to 476g of 100, 200, 800 and even something else. There were another ten or so cans discarded and all but one was 400ISO.

 

Nothing scientific, just surprising or not so surprising insight into consumer point and shoot preference.

 

......[ATTACH]12246[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

400 it is probably because you hedge your bets like most on the day abd anticipate atleast a few low light or contrast ridden shots

 

 

 

 

Images………………………………etrouko

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...