Jump to content

bisschen dick geraten - die m8


christer

Recommended Posts

Guest messsucher
Dürfen sich die Vorserientester jetzt outen?

 

Bin ja gespannt wer sich noch alles meldet. :D

 

 

 

Meinst Du da ist jemand dabei, von dem wir es noch nicht vorher wussten?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Meinst Du da ist jemand dabei, von dem wir es noch nicht vorher wussten?

 

Bei 14.775 Benutzern, davon 2.939 aktive könnte es durchaus sein, dass der eine oder andere schon beta-testen durfte. :D:rolleyes::D

 

[ATTACH]8825[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used 1250 ISO quite a bit, and shot some at 2500. I printed both at 8x10 for a couple of trials; at 1250 the noise really wasn't visible on the print; at 2500 it was, especially in the shadows. The Canon 5D is way better in this respect, but then it's better than any other camera in the respect as well. That said, I would use both speeds as needed without hesitation. Whether I would use an M8 or a 5D in a low light situation depends more on other things than the noise in the image. Probably the M8, as with it and the Noctilux I'm pefectly comfortable in low light, and the low flare low light capability of the Noctilux is astounding.

 

gleiche quelle. war ja auch zu erwarten...

 

ps: 5d is way better meint nicht leiharbeiter, sondern vielleicht, rrr :D

 

und weiter:

I promised not to post photos taken with the camera, due to the firmware being at v0.23.

 

Focussing accuracy was fine; I shot with the 75/1.4 a lot; it was one of my favourite lenses on the camera. I didn't really find it different in focussing accuracy than my .72 bodies. The 50/1 and longer lenses were all fine. That said, I know a lot of people have problems focussing the 50/1 and 75/1/4; this camera won't make that better either.

Image quality, when trying for the best, was truly excellent. Quite comparable to that of the 5D with its best lenses; better in terms of detail resolution for the most part. With the Leica (and CV) wideangles, the quality was definitely better than that from the 5D with the generally available lenses for it.

 

Keep in mind that this is with a camera with v0.23 firmware.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Und noch einer, hoffe dass das noch niemand gepostet hat: Tom Abrahamsson (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=375714#post375714). Passend zu diesem Thread schreibt er "It does feel like a slightly obese M6." :-)

 

Der Bericht ist aber ingesamt positiv.

 

Grüße,

Norbert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Und noch einer, hoffe dass das noch niemand gepostet hat: Tom Abrahamsson (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=375714#post375714). Passend zu diesem Thread schreibt er "It does feel like a slightly obese M6." :-)

 

Der Bericht ist aber ingesamt positiv.

 

Grüße,

Norbert

 

und: "...Well, I am happy to say that they are on the right track. The M8 does behave

> like an M-camera should. It puts minimal "digital" between you and your

> picture,..."

 

so langsam läuft mir das Wasser im Mund zusammen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...