Guest agnoo Posted September 10, 2006 Share #1 Posted September 10, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) knightsbridge/london Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 10, 2006 Posted September 10, 2006 Hi Guest agnoo, Take a look here ... no parking and two other stories .... I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
vic vic Posted September 10, 2006 Share #2 Posted September 10, 2006 rolnald - very good photo... the style of this photo, the look is great (not only in terms of tonality)... i also like the "empty" space that is createrd by the women' position :-)))) = very good timimg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambroving Posted September 10, 2006 Share #3 Posted September 10, 2006 Ron, That Scot was in a lot deeper trouble than "no parking". Don't you remember the sirens? There were TWO police cars after him! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest agnoo Posted September 10, 2006 Share #4 Posted September 10, 2006 Vic, thank you - i was not very happy with my camera-turn, a slight bit more to the right would have saved the head above ;-) William, oh yes, i remember - a lot of sirene-noise, they stopped that scot for wrong driving or something even more critical. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic vic Posted September 10, 2006 Share #5 Posted September 10, 2006 ronald - this is not a studio set-up or something alike. it is a snap kind. it just works when u look at it. personally, dont really mind about that head. u may undrrstand that i have a more liberal and "wholistically" (the whole/complete) oriented attitude to those kind of shots :-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
uulrich Posted September 10, 2006 Share #6 Posted September 10, 2006 I would have paid more attention to the other two stories, though. :-) The Scotsman must have been in good temper. If I am not very much mistaken I know the number plate. ;-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
uulrich Posted September 10, 2006 Share #7 Posted September 10, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) ronald - this is not a studio set-up or something alike. it is a snap kind. it just works when u look at it. personally, dont really mind about that head. u may undrrstand that i have a more liberal and "wholistically" (the whole/complete) oriented attitude to those kind of shots :-) Sorry, Victor. At this very time I disagree. :-)))) This isn't a snap. It is a good mindful framing and includes some of the happenings around. ;-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambroving Posted September 10, 2006 Share #8 Posted September 10, 2006 Uwe, I believe he may have been "under the influence" and I doubt he drove away from this one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic vic Posted September 10, 2006 Share #9 Posted September 10, 2006 hi uwe, how r u ? :-)) ok, then lets take it as u say. (still i like the photo of course:-) the only solution of ronald is to get a little backword as far as i can think. cause: 1. rising the camera up alittle would loose the low/left corner, which is so essensial in the feeling that the shot rediates. 2. waiting untill the two people there will get into the frame would ruine the good position of ladies, because of different timing. and besides - as u say uwe, i dont think that the second story is significant at all. the two (of parking and ladies) are good combo of this street as it appears to me from here now. the couple there add very much in terms of "graphics", closing the road while still making it "empty" in the center :-))) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest agnoo Posted September 10, 2006 Share #10 Posted September 10, 2006 Agree with Vic about the three couples (i wanted). No doubt, not a time-thing or a thing of rising the camera up. JUST a very slight right turn would fix that all. But hey, we´re talking about a snap ... seeing, waiting a second and snapping ... ready. For me the scenery was interesting because of the different levels of the two foreground-stories, nobody could see the other story, only the third couple walking in the scenerey (closing the circle as Vic said) and i could see what´s going on. That was the point why i did it. If failed or not - just a snap of thousand others Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest agnoo Posted September 10, 2006 Share #11 Posted September 10, 2006 I would have paid more attention to the other two stories, though. :-) The Scotsman must have been in good temper. If I am not very much mistaken I know the number plate. ;-) Tell me, that is funny! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuny Posted September 10, 2006 Share #12 Posted September 10, 2006 Ron - You did exceptionally well to have the two stories (well, 3) work without being distracting. the tilt helps overcome the distraction and adds tension. Well done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.