jacopastorius Posted September 25 Share #1 Posted September 25 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hi all. I have a M10 with voigtlander 35 and Leica 50 Summicron and a SL with adapter to use the M lenses and some other old lenses like Nikon and Pentax. Now I was thinking about buying some autofocus gear and given my budget around 2.5k euros I have to choose if buying a second hand Leica Q or a zoom 28-70 for my SL. i k ow they are completely different worlds but considering I mainly shoot street photography, maybe the Q is the way to go for. the question is if it is good enough in these days but most of all I was thinking about the image output given the fact I love the files my M10 and Leica Summicron produce Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 25 Posted September 25 Hi jacopastorius, Take a look here Buying Leica Q. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
erl Posted September 25 Share #2 Posted September 25 Ask yourself, 'what will the Q do for me that I can't do with my M10?' Then ask yourself, 'what does the M10 do for me that a Q won't?' Your answer lies in these two riddles. 😇 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted September 26 Share #3 Posted September 26 1 hour ago, jacopastorius said: Hi all. I have a M10 with voigtlander 35 and Leica 50 Summicron and a SL with adapter to use the M lenses and some other old lenses like Nikon and Pentax. Now I was thinking about buying some autofocus gear and given my budget around 2.5k euros I have to choose if buying a second hand Leica Q or a zoom 28-70 for my SL. i k ow they are completely different worlds but considering I mainly shoot street photography, maybe the Q is the way to go for. the question is if it is good enough in these days but most of all I was thinking about the image output given the fact I love the files my M10 and Leica Summicron produce You can stretch your budget by buying the optically identical Sigma 28-70. Or the superior Panasonic 35/1.8 and 85/1.8 and leave plenty of money to spare. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacopastorius Posted September 26 Author Share #4 Posted September 26 4 hours ago, erl said: Ask yourself, 'what will the Q do for me that I can't do with my M10?' Then ask yourself, 'what does the M10 do for me that a Q won't?' Your answer lies in these two riddles. 😇 I think it’s a mere question of autofocus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacopastorius Posted September 26 Author Share #5 Posted September 26 3 hours ago, jaapv said: You can stretch your budget by buying the optically identical Sigma 28-70. Or the superior Panasonic 35/1.8 and 85/1.8 and leave plenty of money to spare. Interesting..honestly didn’t think about the Panasonic primes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
erl Posted September 26 Share #6 Posted September 26 43 minutes ago, jacopastorius said: I think it’s a mere question of autofocus If you want autofocus, then the M10 is out. Apart from that, I would prefer the M10, but you are free to differ. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacopastorius Posted September 26 Author Share #7 Posted September 26 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) 1 hour ago, erl said: If you want autofocus, then the M10 is out. Apart from that, I would prefer the M10, but you are free to differ. I already have an M10 and love it. I need autofocus for some situations or days when I feel lazy heheh Edited September 26 by jacopastorius 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now