Jump to content

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, o2mpx said:

Seems to be a great 1 lens travel option. Prelim reviews seem to indicate decent IQ out to corners at mid apertures. 

For a small and low-weight travel zoom with less (?) compromises, I would possibly pick the Lumix 20-60mm. But hard to tell, without using the two, side-by-side. The focal length range 60-200mm (on the Sigma) is quite substantial, but also focal lengths I rarely miss when on travels.

Edited by helged
Link to post
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, helged said:

For a small and low-weight travel zoom with less (?) compromises, I would possibly pick the Lumix 20-60mm. But hard to tell, without using the two, side-by-side. The focal length range 60-200mm (on the Sigma) is quite substantial, but also focal lengths I rarely miss when on travels.

Combine with Leica Sl2-s or SL3s high ISO performance, it will be perfect for travel or act as a back up to Leica L lens

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the image quality is up to scratch, I'd even use it for sports reportage in daylight events. 20-200 is a fantastically versatile focal length range, you could capture teams or group shots after a game, runners on a track, many things. Pair it with a 100-400 on a m43 body and you have everything for track and field or oval sports like football or soccer.

As for travel, I'm with @helged in that I'd probably prefer the Pana 24-60, as that is f2.8 and better for lower light conditions. As good as SL2S high ISO performance is, I also prefer the depth of field control that a constant f2.8 lens offers.

Edited by Archiver
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...