adan Posted August 25 Share #1 Posted August 25 Advertisement (gone after registration) The prescription for my glasses (shooting eye - right) has been changed. It is great for general distance viewing, but is blurry when I look through my Leica M eyepiece. My old Rx is just right for the M viewfinder (focusing patch is clear and sharp). Old prescription was for sphere -1.75. (no other corrections) New prescription is for sphere -2.75. (no other corrections or changes) Assumption - since the difference between the old and new prescriptions is an added -1.0 diopter exactly, a +1.0 Leica screw-in diopter would be the correction I need for M viewing with the new glasses. Good assumption, or too simplistic? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted August 25 Posted August 25 Hi adan, Take a look here Yet another M diopter question. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
erl Posted August 25 Share #2 Posted August 25 Your argument makes good sense IMO, but the acid test is, front into a Leica Shop and test drive the variations available. This will give a fool proof decision. Of course, the shops don't always have a set of diopters available. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdlaing Posted August 25 Share #3 Posted August 25 Try going to a shop like Walmart or Walgreens and hold an inexpensive pair of reading glasses in front of of the viewfinder and see if it clears up. They should have a +1.0 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adan Posted August 25 Author Share #4 Posted August 25 5 hours ago, erl said: the acid test is, front into a Leica Shop and test drive the variations available Ahh, you mean like - hop a jet roundtrip from Denver to the East or West Coast, where there are actual Leica stores? I've yet to see any store that actually stocks a full range of Leica diopters (at $215 each - $AU330) for demos any more, anywhere within 1000m/1600km of Denver. 😜 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgeenen Posted August 25 Share #5 Posted August 25 If I am not totally mistaken, you need a diopter that is close to your prescription, in other words a -2 or a -2.5 diopter. negative values indicate shortsightedness. With your old prescription you should have been able to see sharp on closer distances - may be up to TV distances. For anything else (eg. driving), glasses should have been a must have. Now, with a -2.75 prescription, blurriness should start already a few feet away. the Leica viewfinder creates an image that looks like 2m away. jdlaing‘s idea is not bad. Take your Leica to your optician and ask him/her to place one of their testing glasses close to the eyepiece and view through that combo. The value that works best should be the one to order from a Leica store. As written, my guess is -2 to -2.5. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted September 1 Share #6 Posted September 1 On 8/25/2025 at 12:26 PM, jgeenen said: Take your Leica to your optician and ask him/her to place one of their testing glasses close to the eyepiece and view through that combo. Exactly what I’ve done, and often recommend here. Optician was happy to offer use of trial diopters. Math is one thing; actual experience is better. Order the Leica one that suits. I keep my glasses on to correct for distance and astigmatism (prescription sunglasses for light sensitivity), but aging eyes require the addition of a +.5 diopter to optimize focusing. Math wouldn’t tell me that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now