RBB Posted November 15 Share #21 Posted November 15 Advertisement (gone after registration) I'm not a particularly experienced wildlife photographer, but I'm fortunate enough to live in the wild, with wild boar, deer, and the occasional wolf right on my doorstep. I've also been on three game drives in Africa. In my experience, it makes quite a difference whether you're photographing from a car or backpacking. When I'm out and about at home, it's usually very early or late, just barely before dusk. I appreciate the f/2.8 then and don't want to carry 4 kg. I usually have the Sigma 70-200 with a 1.4 teleconverter and the Q2 in my bag. That's light enough to wander around for a few hours. In a wildlife reserve in Africa, I find it more difficult. There's a lot of dust in for example Tanzania, so you don't want to constantly change lenses, and zooming is very convenient for that. During my last trip, I used two cameras (SL2 & SL2s), with the Leica 100-400mm on the SL2, sometimes with a 1.4mm teleconverter. I left the 90-280mm at home because of its size and the fact that you can't use a teleconverter on the lens. On the SL2s, I used the Leica 24-70mm. If I were to go again now, I'd choose the Sigma 500mm f/5.6, given its manageable size and weight, and a 70-200mm f/2.8mm on the other camera. There's always enough spare room for the Q2 to go wide.I definitely wouldn't take a massive 4kg 300-600mm lens with me. It has to be in a bag, carrying around and on the plane, and it's not versatile enough to be my only lens. Sometimes 400mm isn't enough 😉 (black Rhino) Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! But lucky enough sometimes it is And sometimes 70mm is almost to long (white rhino) 6 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! But lucky enough sometimes it is And sometimes 70mm is almost to long (white rhino) ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/423839-sigma-f4-300-600mm-sports-lens-experience/?do=findComment&comment=5893662'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 15 Posted November 15 Hi RBB, Take a look here Sigma F4 300-600mm sports lens experience. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
KarinK_Photo Posted November 15 Author Share #22 Posted November 15 57 minutes ago, RBB said: I'm not a particularly experienced wildlife photographer, but I'm fortunate enough to live in the wild, with wild boar, deer, and the occasional wolf right on my doorstep. I've also been on three game drives in Africa. In my experience, it makes quite a difference whether you're photographing from a car or backpacking. When I'm out and about at home, it's usually very early or late, just barely before dusk. I appreciate the f/2.8 then and don't want to carry 4 kg. I usually have the Sigma 70-200 with a 1.4 teleconverter and the Q2 in my bag. That's light enough to wander around for a few hours. In a wildlife reserve in Africa, I find it more difficult. There's a lot of dust in for example Tanzania, so you don't want to constantly change lenses, and zooming is very convenient for that. During my last trip, I used two cameras (SL2 & SL2s), with the Leica 100-400mm on the SL2, sometimes with a 1.4mm teleconverter. I left the 90-280mm at home because of its size and the fact that you can't use a teleconverter on the lens. On the SL2s, I used the Leica 24-70mm. If I were to go again now, I'd choose the Sigma 500mm f/5.6, given its manageable size and weight, and a 70-200mm f/2.8mm on the other camera. There's always enough spare room for the Q2 to go wide.I definitely wouldn't take a massive 4kg 300-600mm lens with me. It has to be in a bag, carrying around and on the plane, and it's not versatile enough to be my only lens. Sometimes 400mm isn't enough 😉 (black Rhino) Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! But lucky enough sometimes it is And sometimes 70mm is almost to long (white rhino) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarinK_Photo Posted November 15 Author Share #23 Posted November 15 Hi RBB, thanks for joining in! Nice images you shared. You must live in an exciting part of the world 😉 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RBB Posted November 15 Share #24 Posted November 15 Hi, just like you in the exciting Netherlands 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted November 16 Share #25 Posted November 16 On 11/15/2025 at 2:57 PM, KarinK_Photo said: Yes, a vehicle is convenient for tourist containment and makes for easier shooting of habituated animals in the more visited parts of national parks. I just calculated that I must have been on over nine hundred drives over the years…😳However the real experience in the bush is on foot, setting out on sunrise, resting over the midday and after sunset pickup and driving back with a spotlight. 😇 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now