Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Thypoch seems to add another lens in their Simera lineup:

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, allans1976 said:

What do the holes around the lens tube mean? How should they be interpreted?

Depth of Field indicators. It is an idea borrowed from certain lenses made in the middle of the last century...

Philip.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 4 Minuten schrieb pippy:

Depth of Field indicators. It is an idea borrowed from certain lenses made in the middle of the last century...

Philip.

Ah, OK. Thanks. Until now, I only knew the traditional scale markings.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, allans1976 said:

Ah, OK. Thanks. Until now, I only knew the traditional scale markings.

I believe the in/visible dot concept system was first used by Kern Switar on their 16mm cine lenses back in the 1930's / '40s(?) but here's a link which has a bit more detail about the Kern Macro-Switar 50mm f1.8 which was produced (starting in the late '50s) for the very high quality range of Alpa 35mm cameras:

https://aboutphotography-tomgrill.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-50mm-kern-macro-switar-lens.html

Having tried-out a couple of Typoch's lenses in the past (and an original modified-for-Leica Kern Switar more recently) I agree that it really is quite a lovely thing to watch happening in the flesh but (IMO) not nearly as 'intuitive to assess' as good-old lens-barrel-scribed D-o-F lines...

Philip.

Edited by pippy
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if those tiny holes would allow moisture from a misty day get into the lens. I know they are not meant to be weather sealed, but don't we all take our cameras out in foggy, damp or even light rain? I remember such a thing on an Alpa camera that one of my parents had many, many moons ago. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Just now, GFW2-SCUSA said:

I wonder if those tiny holes would allow moisture from a misty day get into the lens. I know they are not meant to be weather sealed, but don't we all take our cameras out in foggy, damp or even light rain? I remember such a thing on an Alpa camera that one of my parents had many, many moons ago. 

 

There has been quite a bit of discussion about this in the numerous threads on Typoch lenses and the consensus seems to be that they had thought this issue through (as might be hoped!) and no problems - as far as I am aware - have been reported.

Having said that I should emphasise that I haven't given the entire www a deep-trawl regarding this matter so take my comments in the spirit in which they have been offered!

Philip.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Al Brown said:

Yes, Kern Paillard. I own one. No reported problems.

Kern Paillard!!!

Thank you very much, Al, for the correction. Even as I was typing 'Kern Switar' I had the inkling that I was mistaken hence my slightly shame-face ambiguity in post #3.

Cheers!

Philip.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Al Brown said:

They were Kern-Paillard Switars...

Please excuse my Brain-Fart where the requirement of 'memory' is concerned. No wonder I failed my History exams...

Then again as (the greatly-missed) Meat Loaf used to croon; "Two Out of Three 'Aint Bad"...

😸

Philip.

Edited by pippy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, allans1976 said:

Ah, OK. Thanks. Until now, I only knew the traditional scale markings.

Yah, in the mid-20th-century, there were quite a few odd-ball "analog-automated" indicator systems created. In addition to the Kern DoF dots.

Hasselblad's C lenses (1957-1982) had red moving blades connected to the aperture ring - stop down with the aperture ring, and the blades spread apart

||<          |          >||  

to quickly/intuitively show the wider DoF range, without having to read the aperture numbers twice. Or so it was argued. See first image here:

https://emulsive.org/reviews/camera-reviews/hasselblad-camera-reviews/the-hasselblad-v-system-master-guide-c-and-c-t-star-lenses

Not limited to photo gear. In a similar vein, c. 1960 Mercedes cars had vertical speedometers, that were a rotating tube behind a thin slit in the instrument. Car sped up, tube rotated, a painted wedge wrapping the tube "climbed up" the slit, and changed color, to indicate higher speed. My godmother drove one of those.

 

Not sure what the influence was for such ideas. Simulating the "space-age" indicators** of the early jet fighters or spacecraft? Copying the "look" of early digital-computer readouts? Trying to be "different from and fancier" than the increasing camera or auto competition from Asia? Just a general desire to look "cool and modern?"

**See: The Apollo 13 movie, with "vintage" indicators recreated for that spacecraft https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/static/history/afj/ap11fj/pics/gpi.jpg

- and also pre-LED numerical-display "Nixie tubes." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixie_tube

Anyway, back to the new Thypock 21 f/1.4.........

Edited by adan
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...