Geoff123 Posted June 20 Share #1 Posted June 20 Advertisement (gone after registration) As we all know, Leica provided M8 users with a UV-IR cut filter that cuts both ultraviolet light and infrared to correct the color of images. However, when considering alternatives to the Leica original filter, finding filters that only block IR is much easier. If I purchase one of these IR-cut filters that does not cut ultraviolet light, will there be any problems with the color of the final image? Thanks a lot for sharing your experience with this issue. I really appreciate your help. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted June 20 Posted June 20 Hi Geoff123, Take a look here Will an IR cut filter without UV cut do the trick?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jaapv Posted June 20 Share #2 Posted June 20 The B+W 486 does just fine for both UV and IR. M8 sensors do have UV sensitivity but all Leica lenses since the 1950ies are natively UV filtered so this is not an issue in any case. You are hard put to find a lens that allows UV photography. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_livsey Posted June 24 Share #3 Posted June 24 You may want to refer to this document and note on page 28 where there is a cover glass transmission graph to aid choosing a filter: APPLICATION NOTE https://www.photo-lovers.org/pdf/kaf-10500longspec.pdf There are of course other makers than Leica of the specified filter for the M8, Leica do not make them anyway they are outsourced, and using a different IR filter specification will, regardless of the UV component, render the colour response differently than the "approved" filtration. Other early digital cameras also suffered to some degree from the issue eg Nikon D2h : D2h / hs and IR Pollution | Nikon Cafe They recommend a "hot mirror" IR filter which I would suggest is the same as the Leica filter. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted June 24 Share #4 Posted June 24 The Leica filter was by Marumi. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted June 24 Share #5 Posted June 24 8 hours ago, chris_livsey said: You may want to refer to this document and note on page 28 where there is a cover glass transmission graph to aid choosing a filter: APPLICATION NOTE https://www.photo-lovers.org/pdf/kaf-10500longspec.pdf There are of course other makers than Leica of the specified filter for the M8, Leica do not make them anyway they are outsourced, and using a different IR filter specification will, regardless of the UV component, render the colour response differently than the "approved" filtration. Other early digital cameras also suffered to some degree from the issue eg Nikon D2h : D2h / hs and IR Pollution | Nikon Cafe They recommend a "hot mirror" IR filter which I would suggest is the same as the Leica filter. Unfortunately the Leica version of the sensor had a different filter from the "off the shelf" version. The standard IR filter was laminated to prevent corrosion, but that was too thick to accommodate the incidence angle of M lenses, so Leica resorted to anti-corrosive coating, which went well for the M8 but failed on the M9, as they changed it to get better IR filtration. In practice any IR block filter will suffice without noticeable colourshifts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now