Alvin Greis Posted March 27 Share #1  Posted March 27 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) Leica M has always been a tool for documentary photography, but now there are many alternatives. However, from the perspective of artistic photography, replacing a rangefinder camera with mechanical settings and no stabilization is almost impossible. The compactness and sharpness of Leica lenses provide an incredible level of detail in abstract images, but this mode of use remains unnoticed. The reasons for this are the skeptical attitude towards the ICM genre and abstract photography. But this is a legacy of the past. And when AI strives to replace a good photographer, photography is given more space in art, including in abstraction. What do you think about the role of traditional cameras in contemporary art, especially in abstract photography? (For example, Tower crane, M11+APO50, ICM technique)  Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Edited March 27 by Alvin Greis 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/420069-leica-m-and-abstract-or-creative-photography/?do=findComment&comment=5777590'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 27 Posted March 27 Hi Alvin Greis, Take a look here Leica M and abstract or creative photography. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
rogxwhit Posted March 27 Share #2  Posted March 27 Irrespective of camera, I feel that abstraction in photography is often overrated (as can sometimes be sharpness!). In terms of the emotional meaning or depth in an image, I think we naturally respond to texture for one thing, which abstraction tends to lack - and that satisfaction requires tension and a dialogue between light and shade, and definition and mystery. Visual over-simplification can so easily be boring. One of my tests is whether I'd like to have an image on the wall and see it daily, year in, year out. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pippy Posted March 27 Share #3  Posted March 27 4 hours ago, Alvin Greis said: Leica M has always been a tool for documentary photography, but now there are many alternatives...... The reasons for this are the skeptical attitude towards the ICM genre and abstract photography. But this is a legacy of the past......What do you think about the role of traditional cameras in contemporary art, especially in abstract photography?......(For example, Tower crane, M11+APO50, ICM technique)...... You might find some of the photographs posted in this thread to be of interest (the ICM images start with post #28 on page 2); https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/417374-project-36552…/page/2/#comments Philip. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alvin Greis Posted March 27 Author Share #4  Posted March 27 3 hours ago, pippy said: You might find some of the photographs posted in this thread to be of interest (the ICM images start with post #28 on page 2); https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/417374-project-36552…/page/2/#comments Philip. Thank you, Philip. I didn't notice it before. Very impressive works! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alvin Greis Posted March 27 Author Share #5  Posted March 27 7 hours ago, rogxwhit said: Irrespective of camera, I feel that abstraction in photography is often overrated (as can sometimes be sharpness!). In terms of the emotional meaning or depth in an image, I think we naturally respond to texture for one thing, which abstraction tends to lack - and that satisfaction requires tension and a dialogue between light and shade, and definition and mystery. Visual over-simplification can so easily be boring. One of my tests is whether I'd like to have an image on the wall and see it daily, year in, year out. This is true not only for photography but also for abstract painting. In art, abstract expressionists have come a long way, from rejection to acceptance by a rather small audience. Early abstract artists like Wassily Kandinsky, Jackson Pollock, and Mark Rothko faced a lot of resistance, as their work defied traditional artistic norms. It was seen as chaotic or meaningless by many at first. Over time, though, the unique emotional depth and the way abstract expressionism could convey raw human experience began to resonate with a select but passionate audience. It eventually earned its place in art history. Similarly, with photography, especially when you’re working with genres like ICM or experimental forms, the audience may initially find it hard to understand the intent. But once that emotional connection is made, the work takes on a new significance. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.