Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I must disagree about the 35 and 50 Summicrons. The only things that are down-market are the hoods, easily cured fo a few $$ at Amazon. The Panasonics don’t feel cheap in my eyes. In fact I prefer composite barrels as they are as stable, lighter and far less prone to reces of use. Another thing that I dislike is that Leica omits controls on the barrels  like AF switches. But I do admit that, when new, the metal and styling feel far more premium. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, jaapv said:

I must disagree about the 35 and 50 Summicrons. The only things that are down-market are the hoods, easily cured fo a few $$ at Amazon. The Panasonics don’t feel cheap in my eyes. In fact I prefer composite barrels as they are as stable, lighter and far less prone to reces of use. Another thing that I dislike is that Leica omits controls on the barrels  like AF switches. But I do admit that, when new, the metal and styling feel far more premium. 

Yes, the Panasonic lenses do not look cheap and offer very good value for money. I used the 1,8/50 for a while and was very happy with it. But the Panasonic S Pro and Leica lenses are even better built. I must admit I would not buy the non-apo Leica 35mm and 50mm as the price difference to the Panasonic versions is too high. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...