helged Posted February 2 Share #141 Posted February 2 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hi, when switching on/making SL3-S awake, I get a warning that Content Credentials doesn't support the drive mode I shoot in (like high burst rate). It's irritating - and it takes time - to click 'OK' to remove the warning. Any possibility to simply deactivste the Content Credentials (at least for those user profiles where the Content Credentials isn't supported? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 2 Posted February 2 Hi helged, Take a look here The Leica SL3-S Review by Jonathan Slack. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
HPFM Posted February 2 Share #142 Posted February 2 (edited) .. Edited February 2 by HPFM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HPFM Posted February 2 Share #143 Posted February 2 vor 5 Stunden schrieb helged: Hi, when switching on/making SL3-S awake, I get a warning that Content Credentials doesn't support the drive mode I shoot in (like high burst rate). It's irritating - and it takes time - to click 'OK' to remove the warning. Any possibility to simply deactivste the Content Credentials (at least for those user profiles where the Content Credentials isn't supported? Same question here, have no answer... 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
helged Posted February 5 Share #144 Posted February 5 On 2/2/2025 at 9:23 AM, helged said: Hi, when switching on/making SL3-S awake, I get a warning that Content Credentials doesn't support the drive mode I shoot in (like high burst rate). It's irritating - and it takes time - to click 'OK' to remove the warning. Any possibility to simply deactivste the Content Credentials (at least for those user profiles where the Content Credentials isn't supported? Anyone? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpauliks Posted February 5 Share #145 Posted February 5 (edited) vor einer Stunde schrieb helged: Anyone? When making it awake from Stand-By it seems, I do not get the message. Only when switching on from off. Still testing. You get it, if SL3-S enters automatic switch off when you turn on. But as long power button is up (display off), I do not get it. ++ Update: seems to avoid message when "awakening" you need to go to energy saving options: disable automatic turn off, disable Power Button LED, Enable only display&AF for savings. Did try for some minutes, works fine. No message when activating display. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Edited February 5 by mpauliks 1 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/418736-the-leica-sl3-s-review-by-jonathan-slack/?do=findComment&comment=5752435'>More sharing options...
mpauliks Posted February 5 Share #146 Posted February 5 (edited) BTW above settings seem to work too, in order to get rid of message when using old battery SLC-4 Edited February 5 by mpauliks 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Photoworks Posted February 6 Share #147 Posted February 6 Advertisement (gone after registration) On 2/5/2025 at 1:54 PM, helged said: Anyone? Content credential works only in single shot mode, any other faster, shooting modes it's not supporting Contin credential. You can go through the settings and turn off content credential on your camera altogether 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tjazz Posted February 18 Share #148 Posted February 18 (edited) Slightly off topic but relevant to the SL3-S. Out of curiosity I just spent some time looking through the forum section regarding postings of film M pictures. Of course they are beautiful, rich, deep, taken by some amazing photographers. It reminded me again that the essence of great pictures is not the number of megapixels in a digital sensor. Indeed, I seem to remember that good film resolves to the digital equivalent of around 12-16MP or so (correct?). So it’s no surprise that the newly posted SL-3S shots look so good. Yes, if one zooms out a posted image of a film shot it will start to grain up. But unless it’s the basis for decisions on microsurgery, the resolution of film or a 24MP sensor seem detailed enough! It just reminds me that my interest is making good pictures, not the latest specs. Thanks. Edited February 18 by Tjazz 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpauliks Posted February 18 Share #149 Posted February 18 (edited) vor 46 Minuten schrieb Tjazz: I seem to remember that good film resolves to the digital equivalent of around 12-16MP or so (correct?). (( This is still in discussion. Depends on progress on scanners. Velvia 50 with a Hasselblad scanner can provide 25 MP. But there is even more possible according to some sources. Some special films (military use) can do up to 80 MP! Film is not dead Limit is prob more the resolution of lens than of the film )) Edited February 18 by mpauliks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BernardC Posted February 18 Share #150 Posted February 18 14 hours ago, Tjazz said: I seem to remember that good film resolves to the digital equivalent of around 12-16MP or so (correct?). Really there are two questions: how many megapixels does it take to properly scan a piece of film, and how many megapixels does it take to provide the same subjective impression as a particular type of film. The second question is irrelevant these days. People mainly shoot film for aesthetic reasons, not for resolution. You can do a back-of-the-envelope calculation by estimating how big a print you can make that you consider "sharp," and translating that to a digital file at roughly 300dpi. So if you can print a 16x20" from 35mm that you consider to be "sharp", that's roughly the equivalent of 24MP. The answer to the first question is a much higher number than what current technology allows. You would need hundreds of megapixels to fully resolve the grain structure of 35mm film. That's not to say that you can't produce satisfying scans at lower resolutions, but those don't look like film. They look like a hybrid workflow, which is its own thing. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeicaRFan Posted February 18 Share #151 Posted February 18 Another thing, in Multishotmode the camera modify the aperture from 22 to 16. that means with the SL 16-35 in Multishotmode you can not use aperture 22, only 16. Can everybody confirm this ? Best regards Christian Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpauliks Posted February 18 Share #152 Posted February 18 vor 29 Minuten schrieb LeicaRFan: in Multishotmode the camera modify the aperture from 22 to 16. that means with the SL 16-35 in Multishotmode you can not use aperture 22, only 16. Can everybody confirm this ? Not really. Using Sigma SL Macro f/2.8 which has a manual aperture ring. Try to use A maybe? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeicaRFan Posted February 18 Share #153 Posted February 18 vor einer Stunde schrieb mpauliks: Not really. Using Sigma SL Macro f/2.8 which has a manual aperture ring. Try to use A maybe? Thanks for reply. I have testet it just now with the Sigma 70-200 with manually aperture 22, the camera turn it to 16. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpauliks Posted February 18 Share #154 Posted February 18 (edited) vor einer Stunde schrieb LeicaRFan: Thanks for reply. I have testet it just now with the Sigma 70-200 with manually aperture 22, the camera turn it to 16. I appologize! You are correct! Also with Sigma 105, I cannot select 22. At 16 is stop! When selecting 22 at lens it still goes to 16! Regardless of M or A mode. Thank you for pointing. Will write to Wetzlar. ++ Update: Mail to Wetzlar done about it. ++ Update: Tested now with a fully mechanical lens w/o any electronics ( Zeiss ZM 28 ). Did put lens to F22 and adapted it via Novoflex M-L Adapter (no electronics as well). Multishot does correct exposure. So, I would guess you found a Firmware Bug Edited February 18 by mpauliks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted February 18 Share #155 Posted February 18 Which begs the question: who would use f22 with its diffraction deterioration? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpauliks Posted February 18 Share #156 Posted February 18 (edited) vor 23 Minuten schrieb jaapv: Which begs the question: who would use f22 with its diffraction deterioration? No, it does not bring up that question IMO. Firmware has to get fixed IMO. Looks strongly like a bug. Sorry please. When shooting Macros DoF it is some time more important than sharpness e.g. Edited February 18 by mpauliks 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted February 19 Share #157 Posted February 19 Nobody denies it might be a bug and due for a bug fix, but a fairly irrelevant one IMO. Macro is better served by focus stacking and the difference between f 16 and f 22 is measured in mm at macro distance should you have a moving subject. Did you check whether the aperture actually closes down to f 16 only or that f22 is only reported as f 16 in EXIF? The fact that it also happens when using the aperture ring suggests the latter. A lens without electronics would not show the bug in that case. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpauliks Posted February 19 Share #158 Posted February 19 vor 35 Minuten schrieb jaapv: Nobody denies it might be a bug and due for a bug fix, but a fairly irrelevant one IMO. Macro is better served by focus stacking and the difference between f 16 and f 22 is measured in mm at macro distance should you have a moving subject. Did you check whether the aperture actually closes down to f 16 only or that f22 is only reported as f 16 in EXIF? The fact that it also happens when using the aperture ring suggests the latter. A lens without electronics would not show the bug in that case. Super hard to check, what it actually does Jaap. Would need to take two shots and compare DoF. But with the full mechanical lens we know at least, that SL3-S can handle F22 in Multishot fine. Should be a minor thing for them to fix hopefully SL3-S shows 16 on LCD display too though on 22 when using electronic. We still cannot do focus stacking with SL3-S to my knowledge or I did not find out how so far. Would really appreciate stacking a lot for my macros!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted February 19 Share #159 Posted February 19 Use manual shutter speed and compare the histograms. I did manual focus stacking long before it became a camera feature. Just take a number of differently focused shots and use Photomerge. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpauliks Posted February 19 Share #160 Posted February 19 Yes, but others can do it automatic now! Gimme a sec. Will update post here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now