Jump to content

Anybody have info on this adapter with extension tubes?


dlove5

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I'm hoping the experts here can help me with an adapter/extension tube set I just bought.

[ATTACH]66103[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]66104[/ATTACH]

 

 

Anybody ever see or have one of these adapters? What was it designed for?

I just bought this off of ebay because it may solve one of my problems to try to adapt Visoflex bayonet short focusing mounts to a Pentax SLR.

As near as I can tell it is an M bayonet lens to LTM camera adapter attached to three LTM extension tubes of various lengths. They have a hammertone gray finish. I have never found any information on the adapter. It is not listed in any of the Leica catalogs, journals, manuals, or books I have consulted. I saw just the adapter on ebay about 6 months ago or so. It too, had a hammertone finish. I do think it had an id number on it, but I don't recall what it was.

 

Any insight or help would be greatly appreciated.

 

The M bayonet mount pictured looks like the kind found on the front of the Visoflex II/III as opposed to that found on the front of M cameras. The raised bayonet mates with the skirted flange on the back of a Visoflex short focusing mount. Evidently Leica may have done this to prevent someone from putting a short mount directly on a camera.

So it probably had some other application than to allow a bayonet mount lens to be used on a LTM Leica. Unless we are talking as a macro lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very strange and interesting... I have a dozen of books about Leitz gear but do not remember to have seen this.. or at least not a picture of. The rigid tubes of different lenghts can make think of some copying function, to cover a number of standard sizes... The lettering is, I'd say, 1970s style... The Leitz catalog for copying equipment, during the years, has been populated by an impressive number of devices, accessories and so, but, I repeat, do not remember to have seen something like; this night I will re-investigate on Laney...;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats it! Thanks, JC.

 

Of course, I went back and looked at a couple of my sources and sure enough there it was. In my defense, most of the descriptions I had seen of the BEOON were not very detailed. Although I did just come across an old Viewfinder Journal article that describes it pretty well. Researching some of this stuff can be frustrating yet addictive.

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...