Jump to content

Elmar-f4/135 Head Adapter


EUSEBE

Recommended Posts

WHAT LITTERAL AND NUMERIC LEICA CODES ?

MEASUREMENTS ?

PICTURE ? ... IF YOU CAN TAKE IT ....

I WANT TO FIND, BUY OR MAKE ONE ....

THANKS FOR YOUR COOPERATION !

L.C.

P.S.: I can understand GERMAN or ENGLISH languages !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Uhm... you say Visoflex III + Bellows II and wish to mount the 135 head on the bellows ? If so, you need the 16558 ring. In my opinion, with the 135 head is better NOT to use the bellows and mount the head on the extension tube(s) OTRPO/OTSRO (16471/16472) ... can be combined...much easier to deal with...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Uhm... you say Visoflex III + Bellows II and wish to mount the 135 head on the bellows ? If so, you need the 16558 ring. In my opinion, with the 135 head is better NOT to use the bellows and mount the head on the extension tube(s) OTRPO/OTSRO (16471/16472) ... can be combined...much easier to deal with...

 

Sorry... UNCORRECT ANSWER... 16558 is for Elmar/Elmarit 90 heads (and used to be included in the bellows 2 assembly), for the 135 you need the same 16472-OTSRO I quoted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi,

I confirm that my request concerns an:

ELMAR-F4/135 UNSCREWEABLE HEAD RING ADAPTER

Here the adapter ring for Leitz bellows

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

It's a M39 screw.

 

PS. Please, don't SCREAM. thanx.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIK, the ELMAR 135 f4 has always had one kind only of lens unit... but are you sure we are speaking about Bellows II, NOT Bellows I ? Here are thepages of Leitz official catalog (1961) : for mounting Elmar 135 head, 16472 (OTSRO) for Bellows II, 16580 (UOOVH) for Bellows I

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

Philippe, what do you think about ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Luigi,

Philippe, what do you think about ?

This ring (see picture above) is adaptable on bellows I as well as on bellows II.

 

Because a picture is worth 1000 words, Eusebe should show us what is in his hands,

i suspect a possible misunderstanding here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

....definitely, the 16472... unless... you LACK the standard basic ring in front of the bellows (the middle ring depicted with bellows and lens in the first page I posted, top left)... but it's part of the bellows itself, difficult to lose it..

SORRY ! ! ! But definitely WRONG .:mad:

16472's DIAMETER ( 41,8 mm) is TOO large for Elmar 135/f4 Lens Head ( 37,8 mm )

Sincerely Yours

L.C.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...