Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

First of all, Happy New Year 2024 to everyone, I present to you my new website on “The amazing history of the Leicas Luxus”. If you want the English translation use your Google translate. I am still looking for additional information on these cameras so do not hesitate to contact me on this subject.

Pierre

https://sites.google.com/u/0/d/136TpK3rJV5nyxhN5Wq3aWs8cuRLiNLi2/preview

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, dubois pierre said:

First of all, Happy New Year 2024 to everyone, I present to you my new website on “The amazing history of the Leicas Luxus”. If you want the English translation use your Google translate. I am still looking for additional information on these cameras so do not hesitate to contact me on this subject.

Pierre

https://sites.google.com/u/0/d/136TpK3rJV5nyxhN5Wq3aWs8cuRLiNLi2/preview

The link says I don't have access to the document

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Find this one for sale by Brecker

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to details here.

https://auction-team.de/project/leica-ic-luxus-gold/

Anyone interested should ask at info@leica-camera.com about the delivery details. If it is genuine, it is a very rare item, indeed. It is a non standardised I Model C and the lens 'should' have a matching number (either 5 or 3 digits) with that of the camera. I cannot see one on the auctioneer's photos. 

Lars showed this to a group of us in Wetzlar last October, but the reptile skin would not match what is on the Breker item! The engraving on the gold clasp was lovely. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

William 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Another problem lies in the description which states that only one Leica Luxus appears in the official 48000 series. Which is incorrect since there are 33 Luxus type Leicas in this series.

“  Note: In the first published number lists for the Leica Luxus, only one camera from the 1931 production year was listed in the 48,000 range: #48441.”

The second anomaly is the last 3 digits of the serial number engraved on the lens barrel which do not seem to correspond to the original engravings found on the 48417 for example.

The third anomaly is that it appears that the Elmar lens was a lens that was engraved with “0” as a sign of standardization. Indeed it is easier to find a standardized Elmar to make a copy and this one seems to have been "scratched".

Well, that's my opinion. Under no circumstances does the seller indicate at any time the authenticity of this Leica as an original Luxus.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally the numbers engraved on the lens are identical to those engraved on the lens. The thickness also of the numbers, the number 2 is strange and not in the same plane as the 4. Finally it seems to me that we see the remains of the old "0" therefore standardized object

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

ive. 
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, dubois pierre said:

Another problem lies in the description which states that only one Leica Luxus appears in the official 48000 series. Which is incorrect since there are 33 Luxus type Leicas in this series.

“  Note: In the first published number lists for the Leica Luxus, only one camera from the 1931 production year was listed in the 48,000 range: #48441.”

The second anomaly is the last 3 digits of the serial number engraved on the lens barrel which do not seem to correspond to the original engravings found on the 48417 for example.

The third anomaly is that it appears that the Elmar lens was a lens that was engraved with “0” as a sign of standardization. Indeed it is easier to find a standardized Elmar to make a copy and this one seems to have been "scratched".

Well, that's my opinion. Under no circumstances does the seller indicate at any time the authenticity of this Leica as an original Luxus.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

All I can say is 'God Bless your Eysesight'. You should talk to Jim Lager about the great many variations in Leica engraving, which often depended on who did it or even on what day of the week it was done. If I were a bidder for this potentially very expensive camera, which I will not, I would be checking the delivery details with the Leica Archive.

William 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear William, there is no entry on the official register that N°48442 would have been released as Luxus nor for 48441 and the 48443. 

9 minutes ago, willeica said:

Tout ce que je peux dire, c'est « Que Dieu bénisse votre vue ». Vous devriez parler à Jim Lager des nombreuses variantes de la gravure Leica, qui dépendent souvent de qui l'a fait ou même du jour de la semaine où elle a été réalisée. Si j'étais enchérisseur pour cet appareil photo potentiellement très cher, ce que je ne ferai pas, je vérifierais les détails de livraison auprès des archives Leica.

William 

Dear William, soon all Leica Ia will be Luxus😏. No. 48442 was not registered in the official register as Luxus nor for 48441 and 48443.

https://sites.google.com/view/letonnantehistoiredesleicaslux/accueil

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...