Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

The last few rolls of film I’ve developed have a strange issue: on maybe 10% of the negatives there’s a horizontal dark bar on the top ~10%.  I’ve seen it on my m5, m2, and m6, so I don’t think it’s a light leak.  It’d be really weird for 3 cameras (2 of which have recent CLAs) to have the same exact light leak.

I just purchased a new 28mm elmarit ASPH, so at first I thought it might be an issue with the lens when light hits it a certain way (i use it with the hood and without), but I saw it on a 50mm image as well.  My current thinking is something is wrong with my development process.  I use a Paterson 2 reel tank that’s developed hundreds of rolls.  Could it bee the reels going bad or something?  I sent this image to DAG when I first saw it thinking it was a light leak but seeing it on different cameras is perplexing.  Have any of you seen anything like this?

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

x

Here’s another example on my m2 taken with a 50mm.  This one looks like it has dark bars on both the top and bottom — same size.  Most only have it on top.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, anonymous said:

It’s on three separate rolls of film processed in 3 separate “sessions”

I think most of your questions are valid so far, the same fault on different cameras is curious. The bottom wall photo looks like it could have a bar along the bottom of the image as well as the top?

If it only affects 10% of the images it's not consistent enough to be a developing fault, besides which Paterson reels last forever. It's not putting too little developer in the tank or it would affect all the roll. Can you actually see it on the negative? Is it a scanning fault, ambient light or a reflection if you are scanning with a camera?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

7 hours ago, anonymous said:

It’s on three separate rolls of film processed in 3 separate “sessions”

 

18 hours ago, FrozenInTime said:

Can you post an image of the negative strip.

Is it one batch of film ?

Here, I was thinking along the lines of a production fault on a batch of film ( or light seals on the cassettes ),  so if the three films used were all identical, you should test something different to exclude that possibility. 

Edited by FrozenInTime
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would run a color neg film through and give it to a lab to process, perhaps some pictures taken in a dark room with a illuminated subject to avoid influence by possible lightleaks and the other way round.

If the CN-film is OK, it is either the processing or the batch of BW film.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 250swb said:

I think most of your questions are valid so far, the same fault on different cameras is curious. The bottom wall photo looks like it could have a bar along the bottom of the image as well as the top?

If it only affects 10% of the images it's not consistent enough to be a developing fault, besides which Paterson reels last forever. It's not putting too little developer in the tank or it would affect all the roll. Can you actually see it on the negative? Is it a scanning fault, ambient light or a reflection if you are scanning with a camera?

 

Yes, you can see it on the negative - clear as day.

3 hours ago, Fotoklaus said:

I would run a color neg film through and give it to a lab to process, perhaps some pictures taken in a dark room with a illuminated subject to avoid influence by possible lightleaks and the other way round.

If the CN-film is OK, it is either the processing or the batch of BW film.

Currently running some c41 through a fourth camera, but I completely agree with this.  In fact, this is exactly what Don at DAG and I discussed doing as a next debugging step.

3 hours ago, FrozenInTime said:

 

Here, I was thinking along the lines of a production fault on a batch of film ( or light seals on the cassettes ),  so if the three films used were all identical, you should test something different to exclude that possibility. 

Ah, very interesting idea!  In all cases the film was HP5+.  2 rolls shot at 800 and one pulled to 200.  I’ll run some tri-x through one of them to be 100% sure it’s not a film batch issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, pop said:

How do you move your Paterson tank? Is it possible that about ten percent of the image area are only submerged in the developer part of the time?

Great hypothesis!  

In all cases I was only developing 1 roll at a time.  The tank calls for 290 mL per roll -- I use 300.  I use the agitation stick to agitate instead of inverting.  As such, I feel like if it had to do with developer contact it would be present on all the negatives and not just some of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, 250swb said:

I think most of your questions are valid so far, the same fault on different cameras is curious. The bottom wall photo looks like it could have a bar along the bottom of the image as well as the top?

If it only affects 10% of the images it's not consistent enough to be a developing fault, besides which Paterson reels last forever. It's not putting too little developer in the tank or it would affect all the roll. Can you actually see it on the negative? Is it a scanning fault, ambient light or a reflection if you are scanning with a camera?

 

I don't think it has to do with scanning because I can see the lines on the negatives themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, anonymous said:

present on all the negatives and not just some of them.

Not if the reel was not strictly horizontal, or the tank. If you look at the whole affected film: is the line growing narrower and wider with a perceptible pattern?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, pop said:

Not if the reel was not strictly horizontal, or the tank. If you look at the whole affected film: is the line growing narrower and wider with a perceptible pattern?

No, it's always the same width.  And it's often not on contiguous images -- it may be on frame 3 and then reappear on 10, then 19, etc. (I'm making these numbers up as an example, this isn't the actual gap).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is an image of the negative from the picture of my son above

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by anonymous
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, anonymous said:

I'm making these numbers up as an example, this isn't the actual gap

You might be able to see a pattern if you looked at the actual numbers or, perhaps, at the running length of the film.

Another idea: how do you put the films into the tank? Are you sure your changing bag is tight?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And here is that negative in context.  You can see the image on the bottom left also has the bar, but none of the ones around it have that problem.

 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...