Jump to content

Your favourite DMR pictures


echorec

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

 

 

 

 

all straight out of the box

 

and thanks for the 12504, Gunnar

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Here is one with R9/DMR and 180/2.8 APO (current).

 

It is of a Northwest coast native American Kwakiutl Seal mask.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another question then:

 

How about the colours? Do you need to do a lot of post processing to make them as beautiful as you have shown here or do they look good right out the box?

 

I'm shooting RAW & processing with Imacon FlexColor. I rarely do anything special to the colors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a couple of mine. Have to say, best camera I've ever used.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Thanks again for really beautiful pics!

 

One last question:

 

Which of my old R lenses can/can´t I use? Do I need to upgrade them with ROM contacts?

 

Thanks,

 

Gunnar

 

All R lenses made since 1965 (at least modified to 3 cams) can be used without further modifications. There is no need to upgrade to ROM contacts, although there are some benefits (Rob posted some examples in another thread) with ROM due to their ability to allow in-camera processing especially to counter vignetting in wide angle lenses.

 

Cheers,

Link to post
Share on other sites

For good measure, three more.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im impressed! i did not know such a quality could be reached with digital. Unfortunately, an R9+DMR+lenses makes a lot of money, you could almost get a Blad with the digital back with the same budget...

 

What's the 'blad's equivalent of a 560mm Telyt? :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im impressed! i did not know such a quality could be reached with digital. Unfortunately, an R9+DMR+lenses makes a lot of money, you could almost get a Blad with the digital back with the same budget...

 

- chris

 

Chris:

 

Have the Blads gotten that cheap? When the DMR was still being sold by Leica they were offering a R9/DMR package that was about $7,000.

 

I don't think the Hasselblad lenses are any cheaper than the Leica glass either.

 

Robert

Link to post
Share on other sites

you could almost get a Blad with the digital back with the same budget...

 

- chris

 

Chris,

 

I just sold my 205 TCC and CFV digital back when I saw the image quality that the DMR produces. In fact, I did side by side comparisons. The Leica was at least as good, not to mention so much easier to use. By the time you crop the square format, it's about the same number of pixels. Now, the CFV pixels are about 9 microns vs about 7 for the Leica, but the Imacon processing really makes a difference on the Leica. And, the smaller format has the advantages of greater DOF and greater ease of use. Subjectively, I much prefer the few pictures I have made in the short time I have had the DMR compared to the ones I took with the CFV.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...