Jump to content

Rail comparisons.


hamey

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I went up to the Hunter valley with some friends to photography BIG coal trains.

We used both mediums, I used Leica R8/9 with the 28-90mm and Kodak 100G slide film

and scanned with the Minolta 5400-2.

Two others used Canon Digital.

For some comparisons between Leica film and Canon 40D.

Shots one and two, are taken with the 28-90mm.

Three and four are taken with the Canon 40D, lens not sure but a Canon L lens.

The speed at this location was around 70 kmh.

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple more.

 

First one, R9 and the 28-90mm, K100G slide Film.

Second taken with a Canon 40D.

Speed about 80 kmh.

The R9 was set to manual focus, Canon was on Auto everything.

Compered to the slide, the scan is not to bad.

 

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting comparisons! The R results are quite nice.

 

I'd very much like to railfan your country some day... Rail photography is most of what I shoot - my site is in my profile.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Ken.

 

I am glad that you're also a rail fan, I have been shooting trains since 1968 and Leicas from 1973.

Compared to my other cameras that I have used over the years the Leicas especially the R are the best Cameras that I have used, the optics are just wonderful.

The M7 is super also.

Inclosed another shot taken with the R9 and the 28-90mm of four 82's (EMD's) with their Dynamic grids and fans howling, heading back to the Coal mines to fill up with 10,000 tons of Coal for China.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...