Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

My bellows II has a red Leitz Wetzlar logo. Most pictures of the bellows II on the internet show a dark grey logo. Does anyone here know whether later bellows II units were delivered with a red logo and if so, when this change took place? Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm almost sure to have never seen a Bellows II with red logo... can you post a picture ? My hipotesis, not supported by any evidence, is that when they introduced the Bellows R for Leicaflex (which had by sure a red logo, at least for some time... my one has a black one, but is rather recent) , they decided tu put this new "component" also on the Bellows II... in which years were the 2 bellows manufactured both ?Ā  I don't know.when the Bellows R was inroduced...

Ā 

Edited by luigi bertolotti
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, luigi bertolotti said:

I'm almost sure to have never seen a Bellows II with red logo... can you post a picture ? My hipotesis, not supported by any evidence, is that when they introduced the Bellows R for Leicaflex (which had by sure a red logo, at least for some time... my one has a black one, but is rather recent) , they decided tu put this new "component" also on the Bellows II... in which years were the 2 bellows manufactured both ?Ā  I don't know.when the Bellows R was inroduced...

I can think of at least four different events that may have caused a change from a grey to a red logo on the Bellows II, which was produced from 1961-1980 according to the Wiki:

  1. The introduction of the Visoflex III in 1963 (according to Laney), which also features a red logo.
  2. The introduction of the Bellows-R in 1968 (according to Laney), as you said.
  3. The introduction of the of the M4-2 inĀ 1977. The first ~100 M4-2 cameras had a red logo.
  4. The introduction of theĀ M4-P in 1980, which was the first mass-produced Leica M camera with a red logo.

Given the relative scarcity of the Bellows II with red logo, at least the first option seems unlikely.

Here is a quick shot of my unit:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Studienkamera
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hair-splitting is mandatory when discussing such questions...Ā šŸ˜„Ā : I tend towards my original hipotesis (#2) even if your other ones are worth to consider (with 1 unilikely, as you say) : but... logos on M4-2 / M4 P do not have the "WETZLAR" writing and are smaller in diameter (I think, have not and cannot verifiy), while, looking at my 2 Bellows, the logo seems to beĀ  the same component (metal - 15mm diam. , fonts "solid-stamped" - not written) painted with a different color:Ā and so is your red one : identical to my gray (bluish)Ā  oneĀ 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

I think (thought...) that my bellows R is not so "old"... (they aren't numbered....) so the one with the red logo can be the first version... and here's another "BUT"...Ā ā˜ŗļø...

The Bellows R exists also with red logo and no WETZLAR : which looks to be a later styling of the logo itself (in the "Solms" years, there wasn't anymore relation between Leica camera and the historical town of Wetzlar) : after some search didn't find any Bellows R black logo "no wetzlar"

And what can we infer ? Possible hipotesisĀ 

- 1st Bellows R (1968) : red logo wetzlar - same component used from thenĀ  also on the Bellows II

- 2nd Bellows R (year ? around end of production of Bellows II ?) : black logo wetzlar

- 3rd Bellows R (year...M4 P ? M6 ?) red logo no wetzlarĀ  (afaik, the red logo changed from Leitz to "Leica" in 1988... don't know exactly when Bellows R was replaced by BR2, but probably before 1988... I doubt that bellows R with "Leica" logo does exist)

Ā 

Edited by luigi bertolotti
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, luigi bertolotti said:

And what can we infer ? Possible hipotesisĀ 

Thanks Luigi, that sounds very reasonable. Always good to know more about one's favourite Leica accessory - even if it is just about the colour of the dot šŸ™‚

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
Ɨ
Ɨ
  • Create New...