Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Leica on launch apparently called this lens the “long focus dwarf”.  We call it the “fat”

Even in this politically correct age I’m willing to overlook these faux pas and give it a try 😁

I’m looking for a 90mm to pair up with early (v1 - v3) 35mm summicrons and the 1969 50:2 v3 

Since the production period mid 60s-mid 70s overlap with the lenses I’ve mentioned, could  the mandler designed, Canadian-built fatty be the answer ?  

Heavier than I’d like but I can’t seem to find the perfect match in this FL - I tried Tele-elmarit thin and love the size/weight but it’s not a close enough rendering match to complete this set, IMHO.  

To put this into context I have the 1979 onward 35:2 v4, 50:2 v4 & 90:2 v3 and to my eye the colours & contrast match up exactly across this 3 lens set.  Trying to achieve something similar with an earlier generation set .

Cheers ! 😁

Edited by grahamc
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ianman said:

I have the fat. And I like it,. For me it’s the perfect companion for my Summaron-M. My favourite FLs and both easily pocketable. Good combo for an afternoon walk in the woods or on the moor.

Sounds great thanks Ian.   Yes pocketable is on the check list and think the fat is “just about”.   

Link to post
Share on other sites

Graham,

Get one. I owned the thin during my film days then moved to the Elmarit-M for digital starting with the M9. Something about those two always left me wanting for more something. Then I got the "fat" and now I feel like I can finally relax and enjoy the 90.

Here it is on the M11 from this past weekend.

Provincetown, MA

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Kwesi said:

Graham,

Get one. I owned the thin during my film days then moved to the Elmarit-M for digital starting with the M9. Something about those two always left me wanting for more something. Then I got the "fat" and now I feel like I can finally relax and enjoy the 90.

Here it is on the M11 from this past weekend.

Provincetown, MA

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Thanks very much.   Lovely shot and I’m hopeful this could be the right fit.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

22 minutes ago, frame-it said:

Thanks Frame-it . I think it may be too heavy for the brief but can imagine it's great - I'll put it on the list to try down the track,  I love my 90:2 v3 .

EDIT: I just realised I didn't mention I want something light (ish) in the original post, sorry 

Edited by grahamc
Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps we should refer to the Fat Elmarit as “the 90mm Elmarit living in a larger body.” In any case I recently acquired one to team up with a Summaron 35/2.8 and a Summicron 50 Rigid. I’m very happy with the trio.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, genji said:

Perhaps we should refer to the Fat Elmarit as “the 90mm Elmarit living in a larger body.” In any case I recently acquired one to team up with a Summaron 35/2.8 and a Summicron 50 Rigid. I’m very happy with the trio.

 :D

Thanks for the referral Genjio, sounds good. !

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, grahamc said:

I hadn’t yet.  250g I see 🤔 

 

Before you purchase an APO-Skopar VM 90/2.8, make sure that you can return it without any fuss. Fred Miranda himself tried three copies, all of which front-focused. My copy front-focused, as did that of another FM member. One owner was happy with his, attributing any minor focusing inaccuracies as acceptable for a 90mm rangefinder lens. An admittedly small sample but five out of six copies exhibited the same fault. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The "fat" TE 90 was the first Leica lens I bought in 1968 to go with my M4. I had used a friend's TE on an M2 for sports work, and loved the combination. When the local shop got in another TE I couldn't resist the combination. After a few years something shifted inside (perhaps due to a knock), and I gradually noticed no shots I took with it were keepers - low contrast and not sharp, So it sat in a drawer for decades. Eventually I sent it to Gus Lazzari who said the rear optical group was out of position. Since I got it back it's been outstanding again. I also have a few other 90s, but this is the equal of any.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TomB_tx said:

The "fat" TE 90 was the first Leica lens I bought in 1968 to go with my M4. I had used a friend's TE on an M2 for sports work, and loved the combination. When the local shop got in another TE I couldn't resist the combination. After a few years something shifted inside (perhaps due to a knock), and I gradually noticed no shots I took with it were keepers - low contrast and not sharp, So it sat in a drawer for decades. Eventually I sent it to Gus Lazzari who said the rear optical group was out of position. Since I got it back it's been outstanding again. I also have a few other 90s, but this is the equal of any.

Your post reminded me that I bought a Fat TE 90 in 1972 to go with my first Leica, an M2. That lens and camera are long gone but it’s nice to have one again.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TomB_tx said:

The "fat" TE 90 was the first Leica lens I bought in 1968 to go with my M4. I had used a friend's TE on an M2 for sports work, and loved the combination. When the local shop got in another TE I couldn't resist the combination. After a few years something shifted inside (perhaps due to a knock), and I gradually noticed no shots I took with it were keepers - low contrast and not sharp, So it sat in a drawer for decades. Eventually I sent it to Gus Lazzari who said the rear optical group was out of position. Since I got it back it's been outstanding again. I also have a few other 90s, but this is the equal of any.

That’s great to know.  The production era definitely matches up with the lenses I’m hoping to pair with so I have quite high hopes now that I’ll like this :) 

 

I also have 0.85 viewfinder so could be nice 

Edited by grahamc
Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, grahamc said:

Are the hoods that are commonly seen with this lens (12575?) reversible for storage, like the hood on the TE thin ?

Thanks 

Yes - also fits same way on version1 TeleElmar 135

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...