Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Bought my 35mm Biogon f2 over ten years ago.  A fine performer on film and digital.

M9.

M7, Portra 400.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently compared the Biogon ZM 28/2.8 with the Ultron 28/2 II and immediately put the ZM up for sale. The ZM 28 needs to be stopped right down to match the Ultron 28’s performance wide open. I was so impressed with the Ultron 28 that I also bought the Ultron 35/2 II, a purchase that prompted the sale of my Biogon ZM 35/2. I’ve held on to four ZM lenses: Distagon 35/1.4, C Biogon 35/2.8, Planar 50/2, and C Sonnar 50/1.5.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

No personal experience, but I did the homework on the 28mm ZM, including paying for a subscription to Lloyd Chambers’ site, and decided AGAINST acquiring the 28mm ZM. It is not one of the better ZM lenses. To be clear, Lloyd Chambers was not the only one who dissuaded me. He is the only source that I can recall, at the moment.

I have a much more favorable attitude, regarding the 35mm ZM lenses, and may well acquire all three. Thus far, I only have the largest, the Distagon 1,4/35mm ZM.

I love my 50mm, 28mm, and 90mm Leica-M lenses, but, at 21mm, 25mm, 35mm, 75mm, and 85mm, have not hesitated to acquire ZM and VM lenses. (I have yet to actually shoot with the 25mm and 75mm.)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...