NigelG Posted November 22, 2021 Share #21 Posted November 22, 2021 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) I’m aware of the debate but find it interesting that having recently moved to NYC (cited in the first article) that someone might feel that (wholly legally) shooting a photograph of them in a public place was somehow an unjustifiable “violation” yet in other US cities shooting an unarmed person dead with a military assault rifle is considered “self-defense”… (tongue very firmly in cheek) It would be interesting to see whether the person in the first report has an Instagram account and is happy to normally post their “life in photos”. FWIW I do not use any social media and am astonished at the disconnect people have between their “privacy” and their “rights” and their use of Facebook/ Instagram etc etc (my point being that I understand that FB/Instagram allows you to be tagged (via facial recognition) in photos that other people have posted and which you have presumably not approved, have not necessarily seen, and are not necessarily taken in a public place…) Edited November 22, 2021 by NigelG Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 22, 2021 Posted November 22, 2021 Hi NigelG, Take a look here Food Cart Thug, NYC. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Henry Taylor Posted November 22, 2021 Share #22 Posted November 22, 2021 3 hours ago, NigelG said: I’m aware of the debate but find it interesting that having recently moved to NYC (cited in the first article) that someone might feel that (wholly legally) shooting a photograph of them in a public place was somehow an unjustifiable “violation” yet in other US cities shooting an unarmed person dead with a military assault rifle is considered “self-defense”… (tongue very firmly in cheek) It would be interesting to see whether the person in the first report has an Instagram account and is happy to normally post their “life in photos”. FWIW I do not use any social media and am astonished at the disconnect people have between their “privacy” and their “rights” and their use of Facebook/ Instagram etc etc (my point being that I understand that FB/Instagram allows you to be tagged (via facial recognition) in photos that other people have posted and which you have presumably not approved, have not necessarily seen, and are not necessarily taken in a public place…) I liked what you had to say about rights of the photographer however It sounds like your a viewer of CNN, your man was aquatinted . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now