ramarren Posted November 9, 2021 Share #21  Posted November 9, 2021 Advertisement (gone after registration) 2 hours ago, oldwino said: On 11/7/2021 at 6:52 AM, jaapv said: I find it hard to describe, but MFT appears to be more "gritty" 2 hours ago, oldwino said: For me, when I had my MFT system, the word was “brittle”. What I've found with most FT and mFT (except the Olympus E-1) is that the default raw conversion sharpening setting in LR is about 2x stronger than it ought to be for best sharpness and smooth transitions. The results of this error are exactly that slightly gritty, brittle look even at low ISO settings. So I created a custom setting such that import sharpening is held quite low, around 8-12 on the LR scale, and increased only gently for certain situations. With this mod to the image processing settings, things look almost as smooth and clean as APS-C or FF results most of the time, modulo the specific camera/sensor in use. The E-1 is different from most other FourThirds cameras/sensors in that it has both much lower resolution (5Mpixel) and a very heavy AA filter. It has benefitted enormously from more recent raw conversion algorithms with respect to noise control (ISO 800 is now perfectly usable, ISO 1600 as well most of the time) and it's unique characteristics allow much smoother, cleaner transitions. It's quite a remarkable camera for a 2003 digital camera ... I've made bunches of rather large prints with it (using upscaled, rendered output to obtain enough pixel density for good printing) that are virtually indistinguishable from the CL or SL or M262. Of course, there are always limits .. G 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 9, 2021 Posted November 9, 2021 Hi ramarren, Take a look here Help: Leica CL vs Micro 43, color and B&W. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jaapv Posted November 9, 2021 Share #22 Â Posted November 9, 2021 Umm, my ACR sharpening is set to 0 by default. It doesn't change my comment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pascal_meheut Posted November 9, 2021 Author Share #23 Â Posted November 9, 2021 1 hour ago, jaapv said: Umm, my ACR sharpening is set to 0 by default. It doesn't change my comment. Same here. I've played with all the parameters over the years. I can get something better and even very good prints but sometimes, I can see on some pictures the limits of the sensor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocalHero1953 Posted November 9, 2021 Share #24 Â Posted November 9, 2021 (edited) Same here, and I set noise reduction to zero. Edited November 9, 2021 by LocalHero1953 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldwino Posted November 10, 2021 Share #25  Posted November 10, 2021 On 11/9/2021 at 8:29 AM, ramarren said: What I've found with most FT and mFT (except the Olympus E-1) is that the default raw conversion sharpening setting in LR is about 2x stronger than it ought to be for best sharpness and smooth transitions. The results of this error are exactly that slightly gritty, brittle look even at low ISO settings. So I created a custom setting such that import sharpening is held quite low, around 8-12 on the LR scale, and increased only gently for certain situations. With this mod to the image processing settings, things look almost as smooth and clean as APS-C or FF results most of the time, modulo the specific camera/sensor in use. The E-1 is different from most other FourThirds cameras/sensors in that it has both much lower resolution (5Mpixel) and a very heavy AA filter. It has benefitted enormously from more recent raw conversion algorithms with respect to noise control (ISO 800 is now perfectly usable, ISO 1600 as well most of the time) and it's unique characteristics allow much smoother, cleaner transitions. It's quite a remarkable camera for a 2003 digital camera ... I've made bunches of rather large prints with it (using upscaled, rendered output to obtain enough pixel density for good printing) that are virtually indistinguishable from the CL or SL or M262. Of course, there are always limits .. G A big part of the "brittleness" I see in MFT is tonal, not just sharpening. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramarren Posted November 10, 2021 Share #26  Posted November 10, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, oldwino said: A big part of the "brittleness" I see in MFT is tonal, not just sharpening. Sharpening effects a modification to the tonal curve, particularly at transitions, so it is a part of that brittle feel. Of course, the smaller sensor is more sensitive to getting the exposure just right due to its smaller dynamic range, and is easier to go out of bounds with in processing for the same reason. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Olympus E-M1 + LUMIX 14mm f/2.5 G Edited November 10, 2021 by ramarren 1 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Olympus E-M1 + LUMIX 14mm f/2.5 G ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/325977-help-leica-cl-vs-micro-43-color-and-bw/?do=findComment&comment=4310863'>More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now