Pixeleater Posted May 26, 2021 Share #21 Posted May 26, 2021 Advertisement (gone after registration) I followed a similar usage map as the OP. I primarily shoot with the M10-R + 28 1.4, 50 APO or 50 Lux BC. Bought an SL2-S to use with the M lenses. Love the EVF and focus peaking assist more often than I want to admit (that, and the M10-R is back at Wetzler for adjustments.) so I use the SL2-S all the time I bought a new 90-280 just before the price increase. (Searched for a used one but finding one was like searching for a white ptarmigan in blizzard conditions. It wasn't happening.) I wanted the reach and native IBIS in body and lens. I use it for nature and birds (I live on a lake) and the last firmware update seems to help on the photo side for AF. I use to shoot with the Canon 5D Mark IV + 300 2.8. Mostly sports. Stayed away from teleconverters because I did not want to lose stop. Perhaps the L alliance will produce a 300 2.8 telephoto. That would be fun to try out. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 26, 2021 Posted May 26, 2021 Hi Pixeleater, Take a look here Should I get the 90-280 lens!?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Jeff S Posted May 26, 2021 Share #22 Posted May 26, 2021 1 hour ago, Gavin Cato said: For those with the 90-280, is it still 2.8 @ 200mm? No, progressively changes, and by 160mm it’s at f3.3, as I recall. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ktsa5239 Posted August 4, 2021 Author Share #23 Posted August 4, 2021 After a few months with the 24-90SL lens, I’ve shot exclusively with that lens. I’m just absolutely amazed at the photos I’m getting. Now the Lumix isn’t going to cut it anymore, and I’m back to the same question. Maybe I should overcome the weight to go for the 90-280!! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_tribble Posted August 6, 2021 Share #24 Posted August 6, 2021 (edited) If you need the reach and have the funds you won’t regret it. I compare the 90-280 at full range with the Canon 300 f2.8 you mention. Now that's a heavy lens! (Nice attaché case holder though 😎) Edited August 6, 2021 by chris_tribble 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
skimmel Posted August 6, 2021 Share #25 Posted August 6, 2021 Hi everyone, I am trying to find out at what focal lengths the f-stop changes. Does anyone have this info? Thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted August 6, 2021 Share #26 Posted August 6, 2021 (edited) Post #23 Edit… ok, so I checked the lens on my SL2… 90… 2.8; 120…3.1; 160…3.3; 210…3.5; 280…4.0. Changes are gradual and progressive as one zooms, so you can roughly interpolate at other settings. Jeff Edited August 6, 2021 by Jeff S 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
skimmel Posted August 6, 2021 Share #27 Posted August 6, 2021 Advertisement (gone after registration) That's really impressive. For example, a 120mm f3.1 prime would not be too shabby! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted August 6, 2021 Share #28 Posted August 6, 2021 You’re welcome. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ktsa5239 Posted August 6, 2021 Author Share #29 Posted August 6, 2021 I went back to the store so many times to look at this lens, they decided to give me 10% off so I took it home! Yay! It doesn't feel as big or heavy anymore after I've held it for awhile. I'm really excited ! Cant wait to try it later today. Does anyone know for close ups, is the reproduction ratio bigger on the 90 end or the 280 end? 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_tribble Posted August 7, 2021 Share #30 Posted August 7, 2021 A win! ☺️ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted August 7, 2021 Share #31 Posted August 7, 2021 21 hours ago, Ktsa5239 said: Does anyone know for close ups, is the reproduction ratio bigger on the 90 end or the 280 end? 1:4.8 at 90; 1:5.0 at 280. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ktsa5239 Posted August 7, 2021 Author Share #32 Posted August 7, 2021 I'm so impressed with this lens! Its incredible the level of sharpness and detail I'm getting! While it is alittle short in terms of reach, but I dont think I could go back to the sigma 100-400 after getting this. Damn, it would be perfect if theres an extender for this lens. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 9 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/320803-should-i-get-the-90-280-lens/?do=findComment&comment=4253130'>More sharing options...
Ktsa5239 Posted August 7, 2021 Author Share #33 Posted August 7, 2021 (edited) Heres another shot Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Edited August 7, 2021 by Ktsa5239 10 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/320803-should-i-get-the-90-280-lens/?do=findComment&comment=4253131'>More sharing options...
cheekz4dayz Posted August 19, 2021 Share #34 Posted August 19, 2021 Congrats on the purchase! I got one earlier this year for a once in a lifetime trip to Hawaii. I really love it and although I don't use it monthly I don't think I'll ever sell it. I also hate renting gear lol 😆 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danno_photoguy Posted August 19, 2021 Share #35 Posted August 19, 2021 I wanted a lens to bring into my local NFL games (Tampa, FL) and I thought long and hard about this lens. In the end, I decided to get the Lumix 70-300 due to the size/weight. I took the 70-300 and my CL to the game last week and I was disappointed with the image quality. Maybe in part because it was a night game and I needed to use higher ISO to get the speed needed, but it just did not work well. Great that it is light and easy to carry, but in the end it it the images that count. I have the Leica 180 and 280 R APO, and I guess that experience has impacted my judgment of what I desire. Of course I did not expect this cheaper lens to fully live up to my Leica APO experience, but it is hard (for me) to be satisfied with the Lumix results. I will give it another test a a day game, but I believe the Leica 90-280 will be back on my list. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danno_photoguy Posted August 19, 2021 Share #36 Posted August 19, 2021 3 hours ago, Danno_photoguy said: I will give it another test a a day game, but I believe the Leica 90-280 will be back on my list. As I think about this, another option does come to mind. Perhaps I should get an SL2 (with IBS) to use with the 280 F4 APO, as opposed to getting the SL 90-280 APO? Much to think about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
didier Posted August 19, 2021 Share #37 Posted August 19, 2021 On 8/8/2021 at 1:27 AM, Ktsa5239 said: Damn, it would be perfect if theres an extender for this lens. Please Leica, hear what we all say we are so many waiting for an 1.4 or 1.7 extender to use with the 90-280 ! 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ktsa5239 Posted August 19, 2021 Author Share #38 Posted August 19, 2021 Now that we are in lock down here in Sydney, I can only shot at my local park. the results of the 90-280 outshines any other combo I have. No matter the 70-200 with extender, 100-400 with extender. The longer focal length means I don’t need to crop but I’m still getting better shots when cropped heavily on the 90-280 it’s just crazy Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 4 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/320803-should-i-get-the-90-280-lens/?do=findComment&comment=4259656'>More sharing options...
LEICAKS Posted August 21, 2021 Share #39 Posted August 21, 2021 This was on the 90-280 on the SL-601 The image was supersized stacking 20 images to extrapolate more fine detail resolution. It's a similar technique Hubble uses to increase fine details. The sharpness at the 280 end is just awesome. And dont let anyone say the reach is too short on this lens! 🙃 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 2 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/320803-should-i-get-the-90-280-lens/?do=findComment&comment=4260446'>More sharing options...
LEICAKS Posted August 21, 2021 Share #40 Posted August 21, 2021 On 8/19/2021 at 7:23 PM, Danno_photoguy said: As I think about this, another option does come to mind. Perhaps I should get an SL2 (with IBS) to use with the 280 F4 APO, as opposed to getting the SL 90-280 APO? Much to think about. If that lens is sharp enough for your needs then that's a great idea. Ibis on SL2 with adapted lenses for me has just been so much fun. Specifically the Canon 400mm 5.6 L USM + MC-21 combo that also takes 1.4&2x canon TCs. That lens didn't have IS and thus can be had for €7-900, Originally mostly used for bird in flight on sunny day shots now can enjoy IBIS. It's super sharp, weighs 'nothing' and produces great images handheld with SL2 due to IBIS. It complements the 90-280 perfectly for me. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now