AKW Posted October 4, 2020 Share #1 Posted October 4, 2020 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hi, Has anyone coded Distagon 35mm? I don't have this lens /yet), so I can't check if there is a screw or something else that prevents coding? Regards, Arto Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 4, 2020 Posted October 4, 2020 Hi AKW, Take a look here Distagon 35mm F/1.4 coding. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
pedaes Posted October 4, 2020 Share #2 Posted October 4, 2020 2 hours ago, AKW said: Hi, Has anyone coded Distagon 35mm? I don't have this lens /yet), so I can't check if there is a screw or something else that prevents coding? Regards, Arto If you do manage to replicate a Leica code, you know that it will show the Leica lens you have faked in the metadata that cannot be removed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
250swb Posted October 4, 2020 Share #3 Posted October 4, 2020 Unless it is a very old version of lens you will be able to code it, just pick a 35mm Summilux code. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
astrostl Posted October 4, 2020 Share #4 Posted October 4, 2020 Quote Thanks for your inquiry.With the Distagon T* 1,4/35 ZM, we recommend to use one of the manual lens profile settings:28 f/2 ASPH. 11604or28 f/2.8 ASPH. 11606Please do your own tests to find out the best setting for your applications.We do not recommend to try any self-coding (6bit coding) on the lens. For further details, please do not hesitate to contact us!With Best regardsBertram Hönlinger_______________Bertram HönlingerCustomer Care CenterConsumer ProductsCarl Zeiss AG I asked this question of ZEISS and received this response. I use the 28/2 because I don't have any 28/2s, so I know to translate any 28/2 metadata to effectively be the ZM 35/1.4. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 5, 2020 Share #5 Posted October 5, 2020 I use the 28mm f2 code on mine and it seems fine,love the lens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKW Posted October 5, 2020 Author Share #6 Posted October 5, 2020 Many thanks for your replies and advice! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simone_DF Posted October 6, 2020 Share #7 Posted October 6, 2020 Advertisement (gone after registration) I don't use any code on mine, there's no need. The images need no correction. If what you want is exif data, you're better served by Exiftool Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 6, 2020 Share #8 Posted October 6, 2020 (edited) error Edited October 6, 2020 by steve 1959 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKW Posted October 7, 2020 Author Share #9 Posted October 7, 2020 11 hours ago, Simone_DF said: I don't use any code on mine, there's no need. The images need no correction. If what you want is exif data, you're better served by Exiftool I don´t care about efix data, but I'm afraid the camera is using the wrong code, possibly the code of the last uncoded lens used. My fear is from the time I shot with M9 and I had couple of uncoded lenses among the coded ones. Today my only uncoded lens I use with M10 is Apo Telyt-R 180mm. It doesn't need any correction so I don't have to worry it if Distagon doesn't need correction either! Thanks for the helpful information! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now