raizans Posted September 20, 2020 Share #41  Posted September 20, 2020 Advertisement (gone after registration) Street and landscape, medium speed? Ricoh 28mm f/2.8 LTM Zeiss 25mm f/2.8 ZM Leica 24mm f/3.8 Elmar Voigtländer 21mm f/3.5 vintage line Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 II or II Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 20, 2020 Posted September 20, 2020 Hi raizans, Take a look here What is best wide lens ?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
otto.f Posted September 20, 2020 Share #42  Posted September 20, 2020 On 9/14/2020 at 8:00 PM, Dennis said: 24mm 🙌 Cause 28 is too close to 35, and 21 is too wide 🙂 That's me +1. Elmarit 24. That’s me 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
otto.f Posted September 20, 2020 Share #43  Posted September 20, 2020 (edited) On 9/16/2020 at 10:10 PM, Kamyar said: So.21 lux is too much? You have to decide for yourself if you want the hassle of a separate viewfinder. I don’t like that because it takes away the whole idea of M photography, with the 16-18-21 this is even more so because of the huge extra finder. With a 24 it is perfectly possible to use the physical metal boundary of the viewfinder for composition. I seldom went wrong with that, except with architecture of course, but there you’ve got the time to repeat a few shots after inspecting the image on your digital M. BTW before my Elmarit I had the Voigtlander 25/4.0 which is a very sympathetic lens and is useful if you’re in doubt whether this angle suits your style of photography. The separate viewfinder is all-in which is not always the case with Leica’s. Edited September 20, 2020 by otto.f 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now