Jump to content

Recommended Posts

x

Yes it's true for vers. 3.6 as well, the Sigma MC-21 doesn't work. It only works with the Lumix S1 & S1R.

For my Canon 400mm f/4 DO IS II USM lens on my SL, I purchased the Novoflex EF/SL adapter which does work.

Best,

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way to use the MC-21 on a Leica L mount camera is to put some masking tape over the contacts. I do this on safari, when I have the  90-280mm L Vario Elmar mounted on my SL, and mount the Canon 400mm on the CL (for extra reach), via the MC-21 adapter, and use it in manual focus mode.

As far as aperture goes with this set up, it's in the hands of the gods, I have no idea what aperture it's shooting at.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, michali said:

The only way to use the MC-21 on a Leica L mount camera is to put some masking tape over the contacts. I do this on safari, when I have the  90-280mm L Vario Elmar mounted on my SL, and mount the Canon 400mm on the CL (for extra reach), via the MC-21 adapter, and use it in manual focus mode.

As far as aperture goes with this set up, it's in the hands of the gods, I have no idea what aperture it's shooting at.

With a dumb adapter, as in this case, the aperture is wide open. If you want another aperture, you have to remove the lens while pressing the preview dof-button on a fully working system. The lens will then have the aperture of the remove lens. 

Edited by helged
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I also am disappointed by not being able to use the MC-21 on my SL... don’t care about AF and usually shoot wide open. 
so I just ordered a cheap passive adapter from China for all my EF lenses. 
Makes me concerned with Sigma and their lenses. If they can’t get an adapter working on SL why should I trust much larger expenditures for ART lenses?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

29 minutes ago, SonomaBear said:

I also am disappointed by not being able to use the MC-21 on my SL... don’t care about AF and usually shoot wide open. 
so I just ordered a cheap passive adapter from China for all my EF lenses. 
Makes me concerned with Sigma and their lenses. If they can’t get an adapter working on SL why should I trust much larger expenditures for ART lenses?

The dumb adapter is the only way to go, unless you purchase the Novoflex EF-SL adapter, which works OK'ish with most Canon lenses, but apparently not all. For my wildlife work I use the Novoflex adapter for my Canon 400mm f4 on the SL. Leica doesn't offer anything comparable on the long end, not even a tele converter  for the VE 90-280mm L 😡. See my posts #2 & #3 above.

You're OK with Sigma L lenses on the SL they do work really well. I have the Sigma 45mm f2.8 L, AF and other functions are seamless and equally as fast as with my Leica L lenses on the SL.

I suspect it's Leica who have blocked the Sigma MC-21 adapter from working, not Sigma. Leica probably has some kind of arrangement with Novoflex for their adapter to have "sole operating rights" on the SL.  It's extremely frustrating and makes a mockery of all the L mount alliance marketing BS  that they feed us.   

Edited by michali
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...