Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Coming from R/DMR and an M, it took me some time to find a modern system with autofocus. I opted for a Q (typ 116) and an S (006) with a 70mm lens and a Hasselblad 300mm HC (for wildlife). I can do a lot with this combo, but at the wider end I could use an extra lens for the S. I have difficulties choosing (just one). What would be a feasible option? For street photography the 28mm on the Q is sufficient, but for landscapes an interiors, a wide angle on the S would be a nice addition. Your suggestions are highly appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, MacSpikes said:

Coming from R/DMR and an M, it took me some time to find a modern system with autofocus. I opted for a Q (typ 116) and an S (006) with a 70mm lens and a Hasselblad 300mm HC (for wildlife). I can do a lot with this combo, but at the wider end I could use an extra lens for the S. I have difficulties choosing (just one). What would be a feasible option? For street photography the 28mm on the Q is sufficient, but for landscapes an interiors, a wide angle on the S would be a nice addition. Your suggestions are highly appreciated!

Send me a PM if interested in the S 24mm. I've got one for sale.  Rob

Edited by ropo54
Link to post
Share on other sites

To add to your Q, I would think the 24 is the best match. It is however a 3.5 lens and does not come as CS version, if that matters. Maybe also have a look at the HC lenses. You seem to have the adapter.

Edited by Photon42
Link to post
Share on other sites

The 24 Super-Elmar-S sounds good. I once had an 18mm on the M and really like the results. A CS version is not what I need, so that is not a problem. The f/3.5 is a bit of a bummer, but then again, the S (006) is not a very good low light camera anyway. With a tripod it will do just fine for landscapes and interiors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not a long term Leica user, bought the S006 about a year ago and followed up with the S007 about 3 months ago, but I primarily shoot landscapes and architecture.  The 24 was the first lens I owned and I have been extremely pleased with it, I would definitely make that purchase again.  I see that Rob has one for sale, I bought my 70 from him, it was in great condition and an excellent transaction.  Good luck with whatever you wind up doing, I look forward to seeing the images you post.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I can't afford the S 24mm so instead I set myself up with an adapted manual focus Samyang 24mm TS lens (with the tilt/shift mechanism removed). Used with the M645 adapter it gives the same 19mm FOV as the S 24mm with excellent results. 

A guy from Poland coverts them and they can be had for around £700 on eBay. I bought 2 so I'd never be without one should my first one get damaged! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If anyone is interested, Camera West in California has a Samyang 24mm TS lens - mechanism intact - for $700 USD.  I did not think the image quality was on the same par as the S24, but it is a practical solution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO the 24 mm is a superb WA. 

One of my favorites...

Similar to 19mm f/2.8 R lens which I also cherished.

Albert

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ropo54 said:

If anyone is interested, Camera West in California has a Samyang 24mm TS lens - mechanism intact - for $700 USD.  I did not think the image quality was on the same par as the S24, but it is a practical solution.

That copy looks to only have kept the tilt ability. Shame as I'm a shift kind of guy. 

The guy in Poland converts them from 35mm format T/S lenses to 645 format (non-T/S) lenses. Get his Mamiya (or Contax) version and you can use them on the S system with the relevant adapter.    

I've uploaded 2 files to Dropbox. Both handheld snapshots with my Typ 006. I doubt the Samyang is anywhere near as good as the Leica 24mm but the price difference is 10x. One thing in the Samyang's favour - it's small and lightweight. 

Hasselblad HCD 28mm:-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/biurq4yz0k3cdgc/Hasselblad HCD 28mm.tif?dl=0 

Converted Samyang 24mm:-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/5kgg1mzkurhhgnx/Samyang non-TS 24mm.tif?dl=0

Cheers

Mark

Edited by Sarnian
Additional info
Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Sarnian said:

I doubt the Samyang is anywhere near as good as the Leica 24mm but the price difference is 10x. 

Cheers

Mark

Not if you buy mine pre-owned!  :D  But, I get your point, Mark.

(I should add, that I am just a hobbyist so this really does not so much apply to me, but to those for whom photography is an avocation, perhaps the extra outlay of funds for the "best" equipment makes sense, particularly when amortized over the time that they will be used).

Upon a quick glance, I thought the Hasselblad looked nicer than the Samyang.

Thanks, Rob

Edited by ropo54
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ropo54 said:

Not if you buy mine pre-owned!  :D  But, I get your point, Mark.

Upon a quick glance, I thought the Hasselblad looked nicer than the Samyang.

Thanks, Rob

Hi Rob,

The Samyang shot could benefit from a boost in contrast - a super quick "Dehaze", or suchlike?

The Hasselblad HCD 24mm is tempting due to its autofocus, but, again, the cost difference is quite substantial.

Mark

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, albireo_double said:

Even though I also own the 24, my absolutely preferred wide in the S system is the 35. I even own two copies of this lens, one CS and one non-CS. They tend to be available second hand much more often and at cheaper prices than the 24.

Before the S 24, I'd have agreed with you. I was always a 28mm FF FoV shooter. 35mm on an IQ160, 28mm on an M9, Contax 35 when I first got the S, followed quickly by the S 35. I really don't get on with the 24mm FF FoV. The only S lens I never bought was the 30mm. But the S 24 changed my life. I wonder if I would like the X1D better if they had a 24 in their lineup. They go from 21 to 30, and I don't care for either focal length.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been following this thread and notice that the 45mm S has not been mentioned. I am thinking of buying this lens simply becausethe the go to lens of my M9 is the 35 MM Summicron.

I use it for landscape and general shooting. Is the 45 ok on the S

Thanks for any thoughts.

Mike.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...