Jump to content

Recommended Posts

hello, as for me I use for my portrait the summarit 50 / 2.4.
its focal length of 50 is equal to a 75 mm, the almost ideal lens (85 mm) for portraits. (and in addition it is proportioned with my chromed cl.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A stunning fit! I do have a fast 50 which works but I do miss the compression you get with a full frame 75mm or 90mm lens. Of course could go M mount but then again I do need autofocus for certain shots...

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ejk64 said:

hello, as for me I use for my portrait the summarit 50 / 2.4.
its focal length of 50 is equal to a 75 mm, the almost ideal lens (85 mm) for portraits. (and in addition it is proportioned with my chromed cl.

 

 

 

This looks cool AF! Got any sample shots to share?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The new released this week Sigma 45mm f2.8 is perhaps not fast enough for some, but it is a fast enough portrait lens for me on a CL  wit a FF equivalent of sixty eight mm.

In my quick test, it focused fast, rendered well, and was compact. The size reminded me of what would have been the size of a 50mm lens before the days of AF.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I use the long end of the 18-56 or the short end of the 55-135.  If I really need shallow DOF I can attache my 50mm Summilux or my 75mm Summicron.  (Manual focus M lenses on the CL are about as good as it gets.)  Some will suggest the 60mm 2.8 Macro, with which I have no experience. Also keep in mind that Sigma has made mention of releasing their 56mm 1.4, (which is an APS specific AF lens that currently comes in micro 4/3 and Sony mount) as part of the L mount consortium.  It gets very good reviews and is not expensive.  I look forward to getting one in spring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Peter, good advice on the 56mm 1.4. That would be even better.

I have the 55-135 but the ability to close focus is a limit. I may end up with the 60mm TL.

i have the 11-23 which is what’s usually on my CL. I got the 18 wanting it’s small form, but end up using the 11-23 more often.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also have the new Sigma 45mm and use it for portraits with no complaints at all. It's a stunning small lightweight lens that delivers on IQ. using it manually is a pleasure too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, having shot for 40 years with a full range of 'portrait' lenses, I'm quite happy using the 35 Summilux wide open for portraits. It's superb. I rely on it more than the 18-56 at full extension.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...