Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

M lenses are as small as possible. No AF, ok. But MF is easy enough with SL and CL, that it is not a problem.

So do you prefer a very small but fast to very fast MF, such as Summilux-M or Noctilux-M. Or a small but quite slow lens with AF like the Sigma f/2.8 DG DN Contemporary ?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I just got it (while waiting for the 35 SL), I am impressed.  Still working with it, but I love the aperture ring  

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m very impressed so far! Lens is sharp, good/great color rendering  

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

I picked up my lens this afternoon, first pic with the SL.

Leica SL &  Sigma 45mm @ f5.6  -focusing distance approx 30cm

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Edited by michali
  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really enjoying this lens.

f7.1 & 1/50s

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Particularly like the bokeh, which is soft and lacking nervousness...

3200ISO 1/50s f2.8

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I tried it at a store and took a few shots outside etc, so I do not have an extensive test, but I got a bit of an idea. I think for my work it will not be worth it. I have the S 45mm, which is obviously dramatically bigger and does not have AF on the S1, but for my use it is better. When I tested the Sigma I was impressed by the size and build quality, as well as the AF. The image quality stopped down seems very good. But I found that I had to stop down to f5.6 or so to get the edge to edge performance I am looking for. I do a lot of night work on video, where wide open performance is helpful, so for my own use I think the 35mm or 50mm summicron SL would be a better option. If I wind up sticking with the L mount as a main system (i.e. if the S3 never comes, or comes at 20,000 plus euros), then I will look into getting one. For now the S 45mm, though massive, will be my choice.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

SL with Sigma 45/2.8 at F4

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Farewell old friend..

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

SL, Sigma 45/2.8

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just posted a few more examples in the SL image thread. I don’t want to double post. The lens is really performing wonderfully for me. The auto focus is quick and I would not have been able to grab some of the shots without it!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...