tracyprestige Posted April 11, 2020 Share #21 Posted April 11, 2020 Advertisement (gone after registration) On 4/10/2020 at 7:27 PM, farnz said: It should not make a difference as there is no one-to-one correlation between "sensels" (pixels in the sensor) and pixels in the picture because the de-mosaicing process done in the camera, where it averages the colour of each sensel in a two-by-two square, will simply ignore the dead pixel and provide the average from the other 3 sensels so the result should not be visible. Thank you for your informative reply! Old leica user and new to this forum where I learned a lot about my gears these days. Thanks! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted April 11, 2020 Posted April 11, 2020 Hi tracyprestige, Take a look here M10-P possible bad sensor?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
nameBrandon Posted April 20, 2020 Share #22 Posted April 20, 2020 I don't have this issue, just more out of curiosity.. does this mapping last beyond firmware updates, or is there a special file that needs to be re-applied after each successful firmware update to re-apply the mapping? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdlaing Posted April 20, 2020 Share #23 Posted April 20, 2020 22 minutes ago, nameBrandon said: I don't have this issue, just more out of curiosity.. does this mapping last beyond firmware updates, or is there a special file that needs to be re-applied after each successful firmware update to re-apply the mapping? Once they are mapped out it is permanent. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now