dkCambridgeshire Posted March 28, 2019 Share #1 Posted March 28, 2019 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) Has anyone tried using eg Polaroid 250D or Canon 500D 77mm diameter c/u lenses with the SL90-280 & if so can you please post some results? I am considering buying the SL90-280 and would want to use c/u lenses to achieve closer than native close AF … to photograph fast moving small creatures from a reasonable working distance Thank you dunk Edited March 28, 2019 by dkCambridgeshire Typo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 28, 2019 Posted March 28, 2019 Hi dkCambridgeshire, Take a look here SL 90-280 with achromatic c/u lenses?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
mmradman Posted March 28, 2019 Share #2 Posted March 28, 2019 With 250 and 500 close up front attachments working distances should be 250mm and 500mm respectively, lens focus at infinity. I have tried Canon 500D (with 77mm filter thread) with APO Telyt R 280mm, it works but i cant say i have anything worth showing. I suspect there is no 82mm version of 500D so for 90-280 zoom you will need step-down ring with possibly some vignetting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkCambridgeshire Posted March 28, 2019 Author Share #3 Posted March 28, 2019 ^^^ aware of this … which is why I asked if anyone has examples taken with the SL AF 90-280mm dunk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thighslapper Posted March 28, 2019 Share #4 Posted March 28, 2019 For what it's worth my Marumi's work up to about 135mm on the 90-280 and beyond that images become increasingly soft. It's been noted that Marumi Achromats behave similarly and perform poorly with other longer focal length zooms. If I recall correctly the 55-135 T zoom was the same when I tried it. There is a website out there that compared all the Achromats and Raynox performed much better at these focal lengths. Quite why eludes me, as these lenses are presumably optically quite simple. Whatever, I'd definitely try before you buy ..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkCambridgeshire Posted March 28, 2019 Author Share #5 Posted March 28, 2019 (edited) Thank you very much … i guess that rules out the possibility of acquiring and using an SL 90-280mm with achromatic c/u lenses for 'in the field' small mammal photographs. Perhaps the Polaroid large diameter achromat c/u lenses also originate from whichever company makes the Marumi achromats. I've also approached Foto-Akcesoria Ryszard Jankowski ul. Cisowa 9, 20-826 Lublin, Poland (the company making C7 adapters) to enquire if they could offer L mount extension tubes. Hopefully, sooner or later a company might offer L mount tubes. Another option might be a long AF Canon lens if one of them will AF efficiently on the SL with the Novoflex smart adapter. I have several manual focus lenses I could use and have tried them … but cannot focus sufficiently quickly on fast moving small mammals dunk Edited March 28, 2019 by dkCambridgeshire Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thighslapper Posted March 28, 2019 Share #6 Posted March 28, 2019 11 minutes ago, dkCambridgeshire said: Another option might be a long AF Canon lens if one of them will AF efficiently on the SL with the Novoflex smart adapter. dunk That's another can of worms that might be best left unopened ..... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caissa Posted March 28, 2019 Share #7 Posted March 28, 2019 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) You could also use an old lens instead of a close-up lens. You just need to attach it reversed. (Filter to filter). An old 50mm or 28mm can give nice results. The old lenses are made of several lenses and quite well corrected compared to an achromat. But the 90-280 is too large for that. I usually tried it with an older macro zoom (70-200). Trying is necessary, the results can not be predicted (at least not by me). I think the new Panasonic 24-105 could be good for that, it is already a strong macro, maybe if you add a 2x extender ? Or generally a 2x extender could be useful for the 90-280 as it focuses already close enough. Worth a try could also be the Nikon 300mm PF lens (with extender or macro ring), also very small. Edited March 28, 2019 by caissa Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkCambridgeshire Posted March 28, 2019 Author Share #8 Posted March 28, 2019 (edited) 7 minutes ago, caissa said: You could also use an old lens instead of a close-up lens. You just need to attach it reversed. (Filter to filter). … But the 90-280 is too large for that. I usually tried it with an older macro zoom (70-200). Trying is necessary, the results can not be predicted (at least not by me). Exactly Extension tubes would likely work and do not require 'rocket science' for manufacture dunk Edited March 28, 2019 by dkCambridgeshire Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caissa Posted March 28, 2019 Share #9 Posted March 28, 2019 (edited) I have the 90-280 and use it typically with cropping for “macro”. With the latest sensors (S1R) there is certainly enough resolution for it. I hope for the extenders (1.4 or 2.0) to give me even the better macro factor. (I do not need to go closer, so a close up lens is not what I am looking for.). I have to see how much resolution is lost with the extenders - I hope not too much. Possibly the SL 90 with 2x extender could be a great “macro” lens. Depends on the compatibility of the system. Edited March 28, 2019 by caissa 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caissa Posted March 28, 2019 Share #10 Posted March 28, 2019 The Nikkor Micro 70-180mm - a discontinued lens because nobody liked it - could be your solution (for chasing small mammals). It's the only true macro zoom ever made. But still nobody likes it (but me). As it's a D lens you would need a AF-D adapter to use its AF. But even Nikon has not offered it, yet (for the Z). So I use it sometimes manually with the SL or with my old D800 (which fully supports D lenses). (The results are very nice, but the lens is completely underestimated.) With the S1R and its IBIS this lens could get a small revival. (Or the micro 200mm Nikkor.) And if Nikon Z would add support for AF-D lenses, it could be really great. (I prefer mirrorless to optical VF for macro). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmradman Posted March 28, 2019 Share #11 Posted March 28, 2019 1 hour ago, caissa said: I have the 90-280 and use it typically with cropping for “macro”. With the latest sensors (S1R) there is certainly enough resolution for it. I hope for the extenders (1.4 or 2.0) to give me even the better macro factor. (I do not need to go closer, so a close up lens is not what I am looking for.). I have to see how much resolution is lost with the extenders - I hope not too much. Possibly the SL 90 with 2x extender could be a great “macro” lens. Depends on the compatibility of the system. Was TC announced, or going to be announced? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caissa Posted March 28, 2019 Share #12 Posted March 28, 2019 They are on the Panasonic roadmap. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkCambridgeshire Posted March 28, 2019 Author Share #13 Posted March 28, 2019 28 minutes ago, caissa said: The Nikkor Micro 70-180mm - a discontinued lens because nobody liked it - could be your solution (for chasing small mammals). It's the only true macro zoom ever made. But still nobody likes it (but me). As it's a D lens you would need a AF-D adapter to use its AF. But even Nikon has not offered it, yet (for the Z). So I use it sometimes manually with the SL or with my old D800 (which fully supports D lenses). (The results are very nice, but the lens is completely underestimated.) With the S1R and its IBIS this lens could get a small revival. (Or the micro 200mm Nikkor.) And if Nikon Z would add support for AF-D lenses, it could be really great. (I prefer mirrorless to optical VF for macro). Thanks but 180mm is too short … The bank voles are very timid and need to be e.g. 2m from the front of the lens. I'm using a Nikon 1 / 70-300mm with extension tubes and the combination works fine … but want to work with an AF Leica lens so can use images for Leica Society submissions. Using manual focus Leica lenses it's not possible to focus sufficiently quickly thus the 'hit rate' is too low … whereas with the Nikon 1 combination the 'hit rate' is high. dunk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now