New Zeiss or used M?

[microview]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Might be worth 'pretending' it's a 28mm Leica lens as Zeiss has always preferred that setting for its 35 2.8 lens, for instance.

[Steve McGarrett]

As I said before, Zeiss suggests to code the Distagon as a Summicron 28 or Elmarit 28 Asph (and not as an Elmarit 28 v3/v4 like they advice to do with Biogons...)

 

However the lens is very well corrected by itself and does not really need a profile, so you can set the entire thing to Off if you want...

[Big John]

Thanks everyone. Will take some test shots and see how things look.

[Go Figure]

judging from what lenses you are proposing here

there is a world of difference in lens signature

between the ZM 35/1.4 and the 35/2.0 Asph. ( or any other 35 Summicron )

 

so please allow me to propose a much more worldly approach:

 

the ZM Biogon 35/2.0

 

but then you could also opt for the new Voigtlander 1.7/35

0.5m close focus range .... I would not want to miss that on the SL