Jump to content

Bokeh by any other name would smell as sweet......


Docderm

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

In the pursuit of great Bokeh I am drawn to the classic, the Noctilux, either F1 or F.95

 

Are there any other Leica lenses that give similar or close to similar results? Or is the Nocti the only way to go? 

 

It would be very helpful if you could include some pictures illustrating how well your preferred lens produces Bokeh. 

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

 Noctilux 0.95:

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the areas of the picture that you can't make out are more important to you than those that are in focus, then the Zeiss C Sonar 1.5 costs 12% of the Noctilux has wonderful dreamy bokeh and a rendering like the golden age of Holywood.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the pursuit of great Bokeh I am drawn to the classic, the Noctilux, either F1 or F.95

 

An honorable pursuit, however you might consider lenses other than Leica.

The Sonnetar 50mm f/1.1 lens might be interesting and it will not break your budget.

My photo bag has 10mm VC, 35mm Summilux, 75mm Summilux and the Sonnetar

fits in a tiny pocket ready to use.

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 75Lux-M and 80Lux-R have nice out of focus rendering (ex1, ex2), as well as 90Cron-M (ex). I am not that found of the newest version of 35Lux-M (ex), whereas the 28Lux-M is better (ex). The 50Lux-M is also nice (ex). But as with everything, enough can be enough...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

And, a couple more from the Noctilux f 0.95

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Noctilux 3D effect

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Noctilux 0.95

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

this one is from the 35 1.4 fle

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 1.4 fle

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

75 Summilux 

as posted on another thread. these are merely test shots, but still descriptive of the bokeh. Both at 1.4

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

another..

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the pursuit of great bokeh, I am drawn to the classic, the Noctilux, either 1:1 or 1:0.95.

Umm—apparently you're confusing bokeh with background blur, aren't you?

 

The finest bokeh of all my 50 mm Leica M lenses comes from the Apo-Summicron-M 50 mm Asph. Of course, the Noctilux, at full aperture, will render the out-of-focus background more blurred than the Apo-Summicron. But the bokeh is better with the latter. By the way, I also love the bokeh from the Summarit 5 cm 1:1.5 but that's ... umm, special, not fine.

 

The Apo-Summicron-M 75 mm Asph also has very creamy bokeh. But I don't like the inclination to flare as well as the absurdly short focusing throw.

 

By the way, many (if not most) lenses' bokeh will significantly improve when they're stopped down by 1/2 or one f-stop from full aperture.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Umm—apparently you're confusing bokeh with background blur, aren't you?

It's a fair point but these days I think it's the term that everyone uses precisely to describe the out of focus areas, rather than specifically the effect of out of focus on points of light.

 

I love the 'bokeh' of the Hasselblad 120mm Makro Plannar, which you can use on the SL with an adapter:

 

33497219715_6e7ba13354_b.jpgWild Thing by Greg Turner, on Flickr

Link to post
Share on other sites

... but these days I think it's the term that everyone uses precisely to describe the out-of-focus areas, rather than specifically the effect of out-of-focus on points of light.

 

I couldn't care less what 'everyone' does when what 'everyone' does is foolish. Bokeh is one thing, out-of-focus blur is another thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't care less what 'everyone' does when what 'everyone' does is foolish. Bokeh is one thing, out-of-focus blur is another thing.

 

Can you offer us examples of out-of-focus  vs bokeh?

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...