easy_action Posted February 17, 2017 Share #1  Posted February 17, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) I currently have a couple of examples of each of the above lenses. From the serial numbers I believe the Summicrons are separated by about 6 years, and the Summarons 7 years.  In both lenses, the earlier model has a focus tab that is moulded into the focus ring and the thread of the focus helicoid is 'course' . The later examples have a focus tab that appears to be a separate piece, and the focus helicoid has is a 'fine' thread.  The focus tabs  Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!       Helicoid threads        There doesn't appear to be any difference in the build quality of earlier and later iterations.  Does anyone have any insight into why Leica might have changed the design?  Thanks     Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!       Helicoid threads        There doesn't appear to be any difference in the build quality of earlier and later iterations.  Does anyone have any insight into why Leica might have changed the design?  Thanks     ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/269497-design-changes-to-35mm-summicron-v1-and-summaron-f28/?do=findComment&comment=3215118'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 17, 2017 Posted February 17, 2017 Hi easy_action, Take a look here Design changes to 35mm Summicron v1 and Summaron f/2.8. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
a.noctilux Posted February 17, 2017 Share #2 Â Posted February 17, 2017 Hello, Â I can't comment on the one piece focus ring/tab, as all of mine are in this case. Â - By the way, the one with coarse threads is "M3" variant with ocular attachment and focus to 2'2" or 0.65m. This is the case of Summicron or Summaron in my possession. Â - Fine pitches are on all the "M2" variant, "no goggle". Â Please look if those with coarse threads have 0.65m focus. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
easy_action Posted February 17, 2017 Author Share #3 Â Posted February 17, 2017 Interesting, minimal focus distance is 0.7m on all four of the lenses. Â I did notice that the 1958 Summicron in the above photos has a tiny screw on the edge of the lens mount (directly above '35mm' in the first image). Â I read somewhere that this might indicate it is a variant with an ltm mount under the M mount, that can be accessed by undoing this set screw. Â However, I have never tried this as the screw is so tiny that I am wary of damaging the head. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
a.noctilux Posted February 17, 2017 Share #4 Â Posted February 17, 2017 Yes the set screw is tiny and very hard to unscrew (in the hole sometime), if one has the wrong size of screwdriver. I use watch screwdriver for that. Â Then after unscrewing the M mount, the lens is suitable for LTM camera with full use of coupling rangefinder. Four of mine can be unscrewed and using them on my II or IIIg is a joy, but not coupled under 1m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shac Posted February 22, 2017 Share #5 Â Posted February 22, 2017 Not sure if this helps but I have the following: Summaron (LTM) 1959 (Wetzlar) moulded tab, coarse thread, min. focus 1m Summicron (M) 1963 (Wetzlar) moulded tab, fine thread, min focus 1m Seems latter might indcate an overlap btwn the thread types and the focus tab types?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
easy_action Posted February 22, 2017 Author Share #6  Posted February 22, 2017 Thanks Shac.  Looking at all of my Leica lenses, the more recent ones all have fine helicoid threads. Is this preferable owing to better reliablility perhaps?  As for the focus tabs, i've no idea. I prefer the moulded ones for asthetic reasons (but I wonder if i'm over thinking this ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.