earleygallery Posted December 22, 2016 Share #21 Posted December 22, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) A major redesign is the least we should expect for each generation of a camera. The camera knows the focal length so there should be no manual intervention necessary. The camera knows the focal length if it's a coded lens. But the codes have no connection to the frame lines which are selected by a mechanical link to one of the bayonet lugs of the M lens. As different focal lengths use the same lug pattern to bring up the correct pair of frames there's no way to reverse engineer that system that I can think of hence the need to select the correct frame manually if there were 6 separate frame masks instead of 3 pairs. Maybe some kind of electronically projected frame line could be designed but it would no doubt result in a larger camera to accommodate the necessary gubbins as well as the current rangefinder assembly. Another answer would be something like the EVF and frame lines in the Q, but then you're talking about a non rangefinder camera. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 22, 2016 Posted December 22, 2016 Hi earleygallery, Take a look here Keep one frameline in the M 262. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jmahto Posted December 23, 2016 Share #22 Posted December 23, 2016 You don't have the option to choose. Only one is valid. Surely you should have phrased the question as follows: "How do I know which frames out of the two visible, is the active frame?" I don't ?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duckrider Posted December 23, 2016 Share #23 Posted December 23, 2016 M3 is the solution for most unanswered questions in life! Or M6-J Thomas or have a look at: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exodies Posted December 23, 2016 Share #24 Posted December 23, 2016 The camera knows the focal length if it's a coded lens. But the codes have no connection to the frame lines which are selected by a mechanical link to one of the bayonet lugs of the M lens. As different focal lengths use the same lug pattern to bring up the correct pair of frames there's no way to reverse engineer that system that I can think of hence the need to select the correct frame manually if there were 6 separate frame masks instead of 3 pairs. Maybe some kind of electronically projected frame line could be designed but it would no doubt result in a larger camera to accommodate the necessary gubbins as well as the current rangefinder assembly. Another answer would be something like the EVF and frame lines in the Q, but then you're talking about a non rangefinder camera. Obviously one wouldn't try to redesign the frame lines in a way that was doomed to failure. The lug business has to go and the Heath Robinson mechanical miracle too. If you can shine an led into the viewfinder you can shine an led screen showing single lines. We're talking about modifying the OVF. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exodies Posted December 23, 2016 Share #25 Posted December 23, 2016 M3 is the solution for most unanswered questions in life! Or M6-J Thomas or have a look at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neN2QxYWj_w That YouTube is so bogus. On both occasions where they show a simulated view through the viewfinder they only show one frame line. Are Leica ashamed of their cheesy double frame lines? They should be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FeralCoton Posted December 23, 2016 Share #26 Posted December 23, 2016 How many times I have asked someone to take my picture and my head or feet has been chopped off. I propose a 10 sec instruction video shown in the VF before a stranger takes a picture. Call it a stranger mode. I never let a stranger handle my M. In fact, I don't let close relatives handle it. They can get their own camera to take my photo. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.