Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

No keep it, especially if they're different magnifications. You need two bodies.

 

 

I am inclined to agree for several reasons:

 

As Peter said, for the advantage of (potentially) different magnifications.

 

to be able to shoot with two focal lengths without having to waste time changing lenses.

 

have different films/speeds/colour and black and white loaded concurrently.

 

back up.

 

The aforementioned reasons have led to me shooting a couple of different bodies, though there is an additional reason for that which is the timer on my M4 - easy to regard as a gimmick, but in truth a major boon when you want vibration free pictures and handy also if, like me you work alone a lot and want to get contextual images of yourself on location. I'm rambling now, but all I can say is, if you can keep it, there might come a time when you're glad you did.

 

Almost forgot: Finally and probably most importantly I imagine it expedites the patina when you've got two black paint bodies clunking together around your neck! ;)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

No keep it, especially if they're different magnifications. You need two bodies.

 

I agree completely. I've been using two bodies for a while now, usually with a 50 on one and a 35 on the other. It saves time because fewer lens changes and multiplies photographic opportunities .

Link to post
Share on other sites

It could be claimed that the .72 is a "the only body" finder. If you have two, .58 and .85 is a better combination. When I looked through a Canon M39 rangefinder, it was an enlighting experience. It had three different prisms which you could roll to change. So the view was very much like in an SLR finder, but "detached". There wasn't the priviledge of the framelines' help to see what was coming inside the frame from outside, and parallax wasn't compensated. I don't know if these would be possible to achieve - propably not. But it got me appreciating the viewfinder being as close to the real field of view as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My two are 0.72x and 0.85x mag and I've been using these two magnifications for several years now, first with M7s and now with MPs. I use 35/75 and 28/50 as my base combinations and to be honest, I've got so used to the speed/flexibility I can't operate without two bodies now. :o I use the same B&W film in both bodies with identical ratings and that helps with the exposures too.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I love the 50 frame on a 0.72 viewfinder. It has enough space around it to see what is entering into the image area. It also is a good (for me) size combination when viewing through my eye glasses.

 

The question I have is with a 0.58 viewfinder, what focal length gives a frame that approximates the same size image area in the viewfinder and space around the frmaes as a 50 does on the 0.72?

 

 

 

Rick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Bastian A.
The question I have is with a 0.58 viewfinder, what focal length gives a frame that approximates the same size image area in the viewfinder and space around the frmaes as a 50 does on the 0.72?

Rick

 

The 35mm frame.

 

B.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How cool is this: Ffordes (I'm periodically checking the used stores for a 280/4) has a used black MP that has a serial number only two away from the one I have (pictured above). Small world.

 

Stranger still, it very well could have been assembled a year or two before or after yours. Leica's serial numbers lately don't make much sense, at least from a time-based perspective. Anyway, that's still pretty cool. Now you just need to find the one in between, buy both, and you'll have the ultimate set. You could probably then turn around and sell them for a $100,000. ;)

 

I have 3 MP's and they all end in a 4. Is that worth anything? ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

35mm frameline is the shiznit

 

I just added the A&A cordoban leather strap to my MP...looks terrific if I may say so myself

 

I'll post a pic soon

 

BTW, there's a guy on the customer forum looking to sell a 50 ASPH chrome if anybody's hunting one

Link to post
Share on other sites

How cool is this: Ffordes (I'm periodically checking the used stores for a 280/4) has a used black MP that has a serial number only two away from the one I have (pictured above). Small world.
That is a heck of a price when you take the VAT off...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh brother, I needed the temptation like a hole in the head.

 

Tell me about it. What I've learned from this thread is that I now need .85 and .58 MPs in addition to the .72 MP and M6 I have, not to mention the black paint MP3 set I've been lusting after. :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell me about it. What I've learned from this thread is that I now need .85 and .58 MPs in addition to the .72 MP and M6 I have, not to mention the black paint MP3 set I've been lusting after. :eek:

 

One for each hand, one for each foot, and one to balance on your head. What's wrong with that?

 

Seriously, as long as they're being used it's not too much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a heck of a price when you take the VAT off...

 

 

There's little to no VAT to take off the price. Dealers invariably sell used items through the margin scheme whereby VAT is only added to the margin between the price they paid and the price they are selling at. Dealers are not obliged to disclose this amount and therefore, if you are a normal VAT registered person/business, you cannot reclaim it. If you are buying from outside the EU, the dealer might knock off the VAT component but it will not be anything like as much as if the item was new.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here again with a 35mm 'cron - probably my favourite lens and my recently purchased Leicavit.

 

Watch out for that hood on that lens. The hood locks in to place and can act as a wrench and start to unscrew the front element. I ended up going back to the round 12585 hood.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...